Standard Finite Well Problem (Solve without symmetry)

IndiaNut92
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Solve the energy eigenvalue problem for the finite square well without using the symmetry assumption and show that the energy eigenstates must be either even or odd.

Homework Equations



The finite well goes-a to a and has a potential V0 outside the box and a potential of 0 inside the box.

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the book's solution of the problem which utilizes symmetry but am a little stuck as to how to proceed without it. Basically, one plugs the potentials into the energy eigenvalue equation (Schrodinger's Equation) and solves to find ψ(x)={ A e^(q x)+ B e^-(q x) for x<-a; C Sin(kx) + D Cos(kx) when -a<x<a; F e^(q x)+G e^-(q x) for x>a.

Once this ψ is found (it's a piecewise function) boundary conditions reveal that B=F=0 in order for the function to be normalizable. This gives ψ={A e^(q x for x<-a; C Sin(kx) + D Cos(kx) when -a<x<a; G e^-(q x) for x>a.

At this point the book invokes symmetry to split the function into ψeven which carries the Cos term and ψodd which carries the Sin term. It then proceeds to derive the transcendental equations.

I am uncertain as to how to get to the transcendental equations without invoking the symmetry argument.

Any help that can be offered would be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What equations do you get from requiring continuity of ##\psi## and its derivative at x=a and x=-a?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top