Standing waves and banjo string

AI Thread Summary
A banjo string measuring 36.0 cm oscillates in a standing wave pattern, resonating at a fundamental frequency of 250 Hz. The tension in the string is to be calculated, given that 80.0 cm of the string has a mass of 0.75 grams. Key equations discussed include the relationship between wave velocity, tension, and linear mass density (μ). Participants clarified that for the fundamental frequency, the wavelength (λ) is twice the length of the vibrating portion of the string. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the length of the string used in calculations, particularly when transitioning between fundamental and overtone frequencies.
phyzeek
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. A banjo string 36.0 cm long oscillates in a standing wave pattern. It resonates in its
fundamental mode at a frequency of 250 Hz. What is the tension in the string if 80.0 cm of the
string has a mass of 0.75 grams?



Homework Equations



k=2pi/lamda
velocity=sqrt(F_tension/miu)
miu=m/l
w=2pif

The Attempt at a Solution


v=sqrt(F_t/miu)
solved for miu and plugged into equation: 7.5*10^-4/.8
v=lamdaf
L=lamda/2
--> v=2Lf
v=2(.8)(250)
then equated both equations

i think i got confused with which length to use
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your work is ok.

Yes - mu =m/L and for fundamental frequency lambda = 2L.
 
I'm not sure when to use the length of the banjo string (36cm) :[
 
When the string is vibrating in its first overtone, i.e. its second harmonic, then the length of string will be the wavelenght.
 
thank u. my answer is still incorrect... i would appreciate any more help. thank you
 
grzz said:
I think your work is ok.

Yes - mu =m/L and for fundamental frequency lambda = 2L.

May I correct my own contribution above.

mu = m/L where L = 0.80m but lambda = 2 x 0.36 since this is the length which is oscillating.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top