Star generatations making elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pjpic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the number of star generations needed to create the elements found on Earth. It is established that the first generation of stars could produce all necessary elements if they were sufficiently massive. Some heavier elements might require second-generation stars, though this remains speculative. The sun is believed to be a third-generation star, with observational evidence primarily supporting the existence of the youngest two generations. The original population of stars was massive and short-lived, making them difficult to observe.
Pjpic
Messages
235
Reaction score
1
How many generations of stars were required to make the elements found on Earth. In other words, does a star have to be born with heavier elements for some even heavier elements to form?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, the first generation of stars could have produced all of the elements, as long as they were massive enough.
 
Some of the heavier elements may have required second generation stars, albeit that is a speculative assertion.
 
Its believed that our sun is of the third generation of stars...

There is only observational evidence for the youngest two as the original population would have been very massive and therefore had a very short lifetime ~10^6 years. This short lifetime would mean we can't see far enough to pick them up...
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top