Stark Effect using first order variation theory.

scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
EDIT: Sorry... I have to use perturbation theory. My mistake.

Hey... I have a quick question. I have to calculate the approximate change in energy via variation theory when the 'error' Hamiltonian for the Stark effect is defined as: |\vec{E}|cos\theta\bullet eR

If I'm not mistaken, the change in energy of the 1s orbital of a hydrogen atom will be:

<E>=k\int r^3e^{-2r/a}dr \int sin\theta cos\theta d\theta \int d\varphi

However, the middle integral becomes 0 when the limits of 0 and pi are plugged in. This doesn't seem right. Am I doing anything incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The perturbation couples 1s with 2p state. It would not perturb the 1s only (In this case your integral is correct). Besides your volume element in r should be r^2 and not r^3.

H_stark=<1s|z|2p>
 
One "r" comes from the definition of the perturbed Hamiltonian. The other two come from the jacobian in spherical coordinates.

I'm not really sure what I have to do now, though. I'm not familiar with your notation. Sorry =(
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top