Starting with Spivak - question

  • Thread starter Thread starter robjow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spivak
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the domain of the function f(x) = x^2 when shifted to f(x+1). The original domain is defined as -17 ≤ x ≤ π/3, and the assertion f(x+1) = f(x) + 2x + 1 is valid for -17 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1. Participants clarify that the domain for f(x+1) indeed becomes -18 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1, as the graph of f(x) shifts one unit to the left. The confusion arises from interpreting how the function's domain changes with the transformation. Ultimately, the correct understanding is that the domain of f(x+1) is adjusted accordingly to reflect this shift.
robjow
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm just starting out with calculus and am giving the Spivak book a try per threads on here. In the introduction to functions chapter spivak defines a function f(x) =x^2. for all x such that -17 ≤ x ≤ π/3
Then says you should be able to check the following assertion about the function defined above:

f(x+1) = f(x) + 2x + 1 if -17 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1

I don't understand why there a negative one is now needed at the end of the domain
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
-18 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1 is the domain of f(x+1)
-17 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) is the domain of f(x)
-17 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1 is the domain the two share

edit:to correct error
 
Last edited:
thanks for your reply,

That doesn't make sense to me.

My incorrect thinking goes like this..

What is f(x+1) actually saying? To me its saying: apply the function f (which is to square) to the domain x (defined above) +1..making the domain of f(x+1) -16 to π/3 + 1
 
Shouldn't the domain of f(x+1) be -18 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1??
 
robjow said:
That doesn't make sense to me.

My incorrect thinking goes like this..

What is f(x+1) actually saying? To me its saying: apply the function f (which is to square) to the domain x (defined above) +1..making the domain of f(x+1) -16 to π/3 + 1
The graph y = f(x + 1) is the graph of y = f(x) shifted (translated) one unit to the left. Since the domain of y = f(x) is -17 ≤ x ≤ π/3, the domain of y = f(x + 1) will be -18 ≤ x ≤ π/3 - 1. IOW, the original interval shifted one unit to the left.

Forget the weird domain for a moment. You know what the graph of y = f(x) = x2 looks like, right? The graph of y = g(x) = f(x + 1) is a parabola the opens up, and whose vertex is at (-1, 0). Every point on the shifted parabola is one unit to the left of its corresponding point on the graph of y = f(x).

robjow said:
Shouldn't the domain of f(x+1) be -18 ≤ x ≤ (π/3) - 1??
Yes, which is different from what you said above.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top