State of a well determined position particle

bluesunday
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I must write the state of a free particle with well determined position (r0) at t=0. I assume that, as it has well-determined position, it's an eigenstate of position operator, with eigenvalue r0. So is this it, in the momentum basis?

\mid \psi (t_{0})\rangle = \mid {\bold{r}}_{0}\rangle=\frac{1}{(2\pi \hbar)^{3/2}}\int d^{3}p\mid \bold{p}\rangle e^{-i\bold{p}\cdot \bold{r_{0}}/\hbar}

However, this would be the state of ANY particle, not just a free particle...

I need it in order to apply the evolution operator to it:

[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/0/3/10317da44bf13fbd709cd642c5143b9f.png[/URL]

with:

[PLAIN]https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/25/2520739-3.png

Being the hamiltonian of a free particle:

[PLAIN]https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/13/1375576-2.png

I will obviously get the state on the p-representation. Is this correct?

I seem to have very serious trouble with the fundamentals of Dirac notation...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
See your other thread on this problem...
 
Last edited:
I read your hint in the other thread. Then what I've just put here is right, isn't it? I put the state straightforward in the momentum basis just by introducing the closure relation for the |p> basis into the |r0> state...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top