Static coefficient versus kinetic coefficient of friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the implications of static and kinetic coefficients of friction on acceleration in a lab scenario. When both coefficients are zero, it suggests a frictionless surface, leading to potential acceleration with any applied force. If the coefficients are equal and non-zero, a force greater than the static friction is required to initiate motion, resulting in acceleration. When the static coefficient exceeds the kinetic coefficient, the object will decelerate until it comes to rest after being initially set in motion. Overall, the relationship between these coefficients significantly influences the object's acceleration behavior under applied forces.
slayerdeus
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have a lab question that I'm confused about:

What can you say about acceleration if the:

a) static coefficient = kinetic coefficient = 0
b) static coefficient = kinetic coefficient does not equal 0
c) static coefficient is greater than kinetic coefficient
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also confused, as I have no idea what lab you're doing. Is something rolling on a hill, up, down, or on a level surface? What exactly are you having problems with, etc, etc...?
 
slayerdeus said:
I have a lab question that I'm confused about:

What can you say about acceleration if the:

a) static coefficient = kinetic coefficient = 0
b) static coefficient = kinetic coefficient does not equal 0
c) static coefficient is greater than kinetic coefficient


The first one sounds as if it should be a frictionless surface (ie no friction).

For the answers, are you looking for stuff like, the object is accelerating, deccelerating, or the object is at rest? I'm not sure what kind of answer you are looking for, but it seems to me if the 0 < kinetic = static, I would think the object is accelerating and for the last one, I would think the object would slow down until coming to a rest or something like that.

Does that sound right to anyone else?
 
slayerdeus said:
I have a lab question that I'm confused about:

What can you say about acceleration if the:

a) static coefficient = kinetic coefficient = 0
b) static coefficient = kinetic coefficient does not equal 0
c) static coefficient is greater than kinetic coefficient

I interpret this question to mean:
Suppose an object is initially at rest on a (horizontal) surface.
What can you say about the acceleration of the object, when a sufficiently strong force to accelerate it is applied to to the object?

a) An arbitrarily small force may be applied in order to accelerate it;
the resulting acceleration will also be arbitrarily small.
b) The sufficient force must satisfy F&gt;\mu_{s}N in order to accelerate the object.
We set F=\mu_{s}N+\delta{F}, where \delta{F} can be an arbitrarily small force.
We have, since \mu_{k}=\mu_{s} that the net force on the object, is \delta{F} ; i.e. the resulting acceleration can be made as small as one wish for.

c) The net force is now:
(\mu_{s}-\mu_{k})N+\delta{F} that is, the minimum initial acceleration is a_{min}=(\mu_{s}-\mu_{k})g
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top