Static Electricity- Solving Material Placement Issues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving material placement issues when combining nylon fabric (Material A) and laser-cut polyester (Material B) using heat-activated glue. The current method often results in misalignment during pressing, leading to unusable samples. A participant experimented with a Van De Graaf generator to create static electricity, which successfully held Material B in place but was limited to one shape at a time. Suggestions include using a gentle adhesive from 3M to keep the materials aligned or employing a conductive sheet to generate a static field across the entire work area. The conversation emphasizes the need for efficient, long-term solutions to improve the pressing process.
The-dude
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Can static electricity or a combination of it and magnetism be used to keep an object held on to a surface?
Hello,
I'm trying to solve a material placement issue at work and I'm exploring the idea of using static electricity to solve it.

We currently combine two materials together using a heat activated glue that's sandwiched between the two materials and pressed together using a heat press. Material A is a square piece of nylon fabric and Material B is a Polyester that's laser cut into a shape with the heat activated glue pre-applied. When material A & B are placed together and the heat press is initiated, the movement of the press and the tissue paper being laid on top of the materials sometimes missasligns the two materials resulting in an unusable sample. I can have 5+ shapes of Material B laying on Material A at a time so placement is critical. The heat press base is a Silicone mat but I also have Nomex as an option. I've already explored alternative solutions like using a strip of tape on the bottom of the press and pressing the materials upside down and that worked but I would have to replace the tape every 25-30 presses which will not be efficient long term if I'm pressing 600+ pieces.

I thought about alternative options and static electricity came to mind. I had a Van De Graaf machine lying around so I figured I would play around with it. My first test yielded some interesting results. I connected the ground end of a the VDG machine to the bottom pad (nomex worked the best) and taped a piece of insulated copper wire to the top of the VDG silver bulb. I was able to successfully get Material B to statically layflat as I passed the wire over the surface of the material. I even tried blowing it off of the material using air but to my surprise, it stayed. I don't think my VDG machine is generating a large enough field to cover the entire heat press base because it was only affecting one shape at a time as I passed over it with the wire.

Is there another safe option without cranking up the voltage on my VDG or eliminating using electricity entirely to attract the two materials?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4926.jpg
    IMG_4926.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 346
  • IMG_4927.jpg
    IMG_4927.jpg
    71 KB · Views: 331
  • IMG_4928.jpg
    IMG_4928.jpg
    51.2 KB · Views: 340
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The-dude said:
Material A is a square piece of nylon fabric and Material B is a Polyester that's laser cut into a shape with the heat activated glue pre-applied.
A vacuum table with many small holes could be used if air could be drawn through material A, while material B was less porous or coated with glue.
 
Thanks for the reply! The Nylon material has pelon fused to the back so air does not pass through it; a vacuum table won't work for this setup unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
The-dude said:
When material A & B are placed together and the heat press is initiated, the movement of the press and the tissue paper being laid on top of the materials sometimes missasligns the two materials resulting in an unusable sample
You might contact 3M to see if they have a version of their Post-It Notes gentle adhesive that might be compatible with your heat-activated adhesive. If you can roll the 3M gentle adhesive (I'm not sure how it is applied to Post-It Notes) onto your cut pieces before placement, and if the 3M adhesive does not interfere with the heat activated adhesive quality, that may be a good way to gently hold the pieces in place in your process...
 
Since you had good results with the VDG and a wire, how about using a sheet of metal (any conductor) to apply a field to the whole work area simultaneously?

Maybe as a pre-process as you did in the experiment or build it into one of the press platens.

An intermediate approach is a straight wire across the work area that can be moved across the area for each press load. Figure out how to mount the wire on a frame and tracks so you only have to slide it. The movement could even be automated with mechanical linkage to the press (if job sizes make it worthwhile).

From this distance at least, it seems easy to try. :rolleyes:

Cheers,
Tom
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top