Static equilibrium force decomposition problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a static equilibrium force decomposition problem involving torque calculations. Participants clarify that the torque equation includes terms for normal force and gravitational force, emphasizing the importance of using the perpendicular radius to correctly apply trigonometric functions. A misunderstanding regarding the signs of the trigonometric components is acknowledged, with one participant realizing their mistake in applying the angles. The correct torque equation is confirmed to be $$\sum \tau_0 = L\cdot N_1 \cdot cos \theta - LF_1 sin \theta - L/2 \cdot G cos \theta$$. Overall, the conversation highlights the significance of accurate angle representation in torque calculations.
Navyeel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I dont fully understand why the decompositions of forces.
Relevant Equations
F stands for friction, N is normalforce.
If you see the $\sum \tau_0 = L\cdot N_1 \cdot cos \theta - LF_1 sin \theta - L/2 \cdot G cos \theta$, all the trigonemetric parts are all opposite of what i can understand, given the angle as drawed in the Picture/url.

Please help me :)https://pasteboard.co/IiXr8qA.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it, my fault was that i forgot that in torque that if i use perpendicular radius i will get the cosines and the sinus parts correct :)
 
Yes it's always the perpendicular radius you need to use.

I note they are summing the torque about an axis at the top of the ladder.
 
Navyeel said:
If you see the $\sum \tau_0 = L\cdot N_1 \cdot cos \theta - LF_1 sin \theta - L/2 \cdot G cos \theta$
To get that LaTeX to render, you need doubled dollar signs like so:
$$\sum \tau_0 = L\cdot N_1 \cdot cos \theta - LF_1 sin \theta - L/2 \cdot G cos \theta$$
 
Ah ok, thanks :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top