Static Equilibrium problem results not well understood. Please help.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a static equilibrium problem involving a weightless bar subjected to various forces. The user is confused by the differing values for DE calculated from different pivot points, with results ranging from 3.33 to 6.66, while the correct answer is noted as 3.33 according to the textbook. It is highlighted that the system is not in translational equilibrium, as the sum of the forces does not equal zero, indicating an imbalance. When adjusting one of the forces to achieve translational equilibrium, a consistent value for DE is obtained, reinforcing the importance of considering the correct conditions for equilibrium. The conversation emphasizes the need to analyze the problem carefully, particularly which point to use for calculating moments.
zacc
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The attached figure shows a weightless bar with several forces applied to it (all in New). The distances are as follow: AB=6m, BC=1m and CD=3m. The question is to calculate DE so there is equilibrium.


Homework Equations



ƩM=0 (Rotational equilibrium) (Counterclockwise moments are +)


The Attempt at a Solution



I have been going around this problem for a while. I tried to apply the equilibrium condition:

ƩM=0 where M are the moments. But I get different answers depending on which point I choose to calculate the moments:

A: 0x2+6x6-8x7+10x12-(10+DE)6=0 This gives DE=6.66
D: 2x10-4x6+8x3-6DE=0 This gives DE=3,33 (the correct answer according to the book)
C: 2x7-6x1+3x12-(3+DE)6=0 This gives DE=4.3

So, I am a little lost here.

The only thing that I can notice is that the system is not at translational equilibrium as:

ƩF ≠ 0 (forces pointing up are +)

In fact, if I make F5=8 N so that ƩF=0 then DE comes to the same answer (2.5) no matter which point I use to calculate the moments. This is what I was expecting before as well.

Could please someone help me to understand these results? Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Moments1j.jpg
    Moments1j.jpg
    5.7 KB · Views: 459
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi zacc!

The figure seems to be missing? :confused:
 
Sorry, for some reason the attachment did not go through the first time. I edited it and it should be there now. Thanks!
 
You get different answers because you aren't considering about which point the equilibrium needs to be considered. Strangely, the question doesn't mention this, but from your answers, it turns out to be about D.

Take for example a smaller rod, as in the attachment. Judging from A, it is in rotational equilibrium, but is it from B? :wink:
 

Attachments

  • torq.png
    torq.png
    922 bytes · Views: 429
zacc said:

Homework Statement



The attached figure shows a weightless bar with several forces applied to it (all in New). The distances are as follow: AB=6m, BC=1m and CD=3m. The question is to calculate DE so there is equilibrium.

Homework Equations



ƩM=0 (Rotational equilibrium) (Counterclockwise moments are +)

The Attempt at a Solution



I have been going around this problem for a while. I tried to apply the equilibrium condition:

ƩM=0 where M are the moments. But I get different answers depending on which point I choose to calculate the moments:

A: 0x2+6x6-8x7+10x12-(10+DE)6=0 This gives DE=6.66
D: 2x10-4x6+8x3-6DE=0 This gives DE=3,33 (the correct answer according to the book)
C: 2x7-6x1+3x12-(3+DE)6=0 This gives DE=4.3

So, I am a little lost here.

The only thing that I can notice is that the system is not at translational equilibrium as:

ƩF ≠ 0 (forces pointing up are +)

In fact, if I make F5=8 N so that ƩF=0 then DE comes to the same answer (2.5) no matter which point I use to calculate the moments. This is what I was expecting before as well.

Could please someone help me to understand these results? Thanks for the help!

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The net upward force is 18, and the net downward force is 16. What does this tell you about the bar being in equilibrium?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top