Static Equilibrium Pulley and free body diagram

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving equations for a static equilibrium pulley problem. The user presented their free body diagram and equations for forces in both x and y directions, indicating difficulty in solving for the angle theta and tension. A suggestion was made to rearrange the equations to isolate theta, allowing for the cancellation of tension terms. This approach proved successful for the user, leading to a resolution of their problem. The exchange highlights the importance of methodical problem-solving in physics.
sharp12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Attached is the picture of the problem and my free body diagram.
The system is in equilibrium.

Homework Equations



Fy = 0 Fx = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having trouble solving the two equations that I arrive with...

I use +x to the right, and +y up.

For the forces in x: -TacCos(60) + TacCos(20) - 2000Sin(theta) = 0

For the forces in y: TacSin(60) + TacSin(20) - 2000Cos(theta) = 0

When trying to solve these two equations, I tried adding them together and setting them equal to each other but I've had no luck. What am I doing wrong or missing here?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    5.4 KB · Views: 968
  • Capture2.PNG
    Capture2.PNG
    1.5 KB · Views: 765
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi sharp,

I guess you need to find theta and the tension so as the pulley is n equilibrium.

Your equations look correct. Move the term with theta on the other side, then divide the equations: the tension will cancel and you can solve for theta.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Hi sharp,

I guess you need to find theta and the tension so as the pulley is n equilibrium.

Your equations look correct. Move the term with theta on the other side, then divide the equations: the tension will cancel and you can solve for theta.

ehild


Hi ehild,

Thank you! That worked out quite nicely. :)!
 
You are welcome. :smile: I was really pleased with your suggestive pictures. Remember the method. ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top