Statistical Mechanics - Books suggestions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking additional resources for studying Statistical Mechanics, particularly in light of a challenging teaching style from the instructor. The participant has already purchased several key texts, including "Statistical Mechanics" by R. Pathria and "Intro. to Modern Statistical Mechanics" by Chandler. They emphasize the importance of proactive learning by reading ahead and asking questions to clarify concepts. A recommendation is made for the free PDF of a resource from Cornell, which could aid in self-study. Overall, the focus is on finding effective materials and strategies to navigate the complexities of Statistical Mechanics.
JRPB
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm taking Statistical Mechanics this semester. I already took Thermodynamics, covering the first three laws (0,1,2) at the level of Fermi's Thermodynamics book (and other similar ones). My Stat. Mech. teacher is a condensed matter experimentalist and he's boss at what he does, no question about it. However, on the teaching side, well... I have a lot of work to do on my own. I always try to not stay within the confines of my course's program and learn whatever else I can during that period. But, whenever entering a new topic (new for me), I need guidance to avoid getting lost in the vast, vast world of physics. I doubt I'm going to get that from my teacher unless I ask the proper questions (which are hard to come by, given his teaching style). Only the first few classes have passed, but I suspect it's hardly going to get any better (I sure hope it does!)

I bought these books: "Statistical Mechanics" by R. Pathria. "Intro. to Modern Statistical Mechanics" by Chandler and "Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics" by Greiner.

I was wondering if you could offer some advice as to what material/books to use in order to complement my course and pretty much, teach myself undergraduate level Statistical Mechanics.

Thanks in advance.

P.S. I'm in my senior year, taking all the fun stuff (ED, QM, SM and one last Mathematical Methods course).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful not to get lost by reading too many different books, but...
http://pages.physics.cornell.edu/~sethna/StatMech/
I've heard this is good and the pdf version is free (if you like it enough, buy the hard copy).

You will need to ask lots of questions. Perhaps that should always be true, but I thought it more important with stat mech. Find out what the next lecture will be and read ahead. Then you can ask about your questions instead of waiting for the professor to say something confusing.
 
Thanks for the suggestion.

For anyone else interested, I found a very promising book: Statistical Physics by Reif (the smaller one, Vol. 5 of Berkeley's series).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top