[Statistical Physics] Spin-1 atoms in uniform magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mean magnetic moment M of a crystal containing N spin-1 atoms in a uniform magnetic field B at thermal equilibrium temperature T. The partition function Z is derived, accounting for the different orientations of the atoms in the magnetic field, leading to the expression Z = 2 + cosh(x), where x = βμB. The confusion arises regarding the calculation of the mean magnetic moment, as the straightforward approach M = Nμ seems inadequate. The correct expression for M is provided as M = Nμ(2sinh(x)/(1 + 2cosh(x))). The discussion highlights the importance of using the definition of mean energy and magnetization to derive the correct formula.
timon
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A crystal contains N atoms which posses spin 1 and magnetic moment \mu. Placed in a uniform magnetic field B the atoms can orient themselves in three directions: parallel, perpendicular, and antiparallel to the field. If the crystal is in thermal equilibrium at temperature T find an expression for its mean magnetic moment M, assuming that only the interactions of the dipoles with the field B need be considered. [This is a literal transcription of exercise 3.1 from the second edition of Statistical Physics by F. Mandl. ]

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I wrote down the partition function, henceforth denoted Z. There are two perpendicular states, which have no interaction energy. There are also two parallel states, separated by a minus sign. Therefore, if I take x = \beta \mu B I get

Z = e^0 + e^0 + e^{-\beta \mu B} + e^{\beta \mu B} = 2 + \cosh(x).

Now I get confused. How can I calculate the mean magnetic moment if the book gives me the magnetic moment for each atom? Surely, M = N \mu is a little too simple. Besides, the answer is given in the back of the book as

M = N \mu \frac{2sinh(x)}{1+2cosh(x)}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I should use the definition of mean energy and then the magnetization, but I'm not sure how to approach the problem from this point.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top