Statistics, Conditional distributions, UMVUE, Rao-Blackwell

libragirl79
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a general concept question.
I am working with finding complete sufficient statistics of distributions. Sometimes I need to condition some function of a parameter on a sufficient statistic, using basically Rao-Blackwell, but my trouble is in finding the conditional distributions so I can get the mean.

For example, if Xbar denotes the mean of some random sample X1,X2,...Xn from a gamma distribution where alpha is known and beta is the parameter I am trying to estimate, I know that Xbar is the sufficient statistic and choosing X1 as my preliminary estimator, I would condition it on Xbar and get the mean, so I am trying to find:
E[X1|Xbar]. My question is how do I find the distribution of X1|Xbar? I know that conditional distribution is joint of (X1 and Xbar) divided by pdf of Xbar, but I am not sure how to actually go about this...

Another example would be if I have a pdf: e^-(x-θ) and want to find the best unbiased estimator for θ^r. So, given that I know that smallest order statistic X(1) is my complete sufficient statistic, I am basically looking for E[some function u(x)|X(1)]=θ^r and to find that function, need to get the conditional distribution of u(x) given X(1).

I hope this makes sense of what I am trying to do...

Thanks very much for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hm. Don't you want an unbiased estimator to start with? Is X1 unbiased for β?
 
No, X1 wouldn't be an unbiased estimator of Beta, since the mean of X1 is alpha*beta given that X1 has gamma dist...
 
Yeah, it seems a bit difficult. If you're looking for the UMVUE, you don't have to though. Can't you use Lehmann-Scheffe here, in the case of the Gamma?
 
yeah, I believe if alpha is given, then the MLE for Gamma would be Xbar/alpha. I am just not sure how to get these conditional distributions when doing Rao-Blackwellizing...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top