Statistics: The W's of US Death Estimate (2005-2050)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shay10825
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the accuracy of a dataset estimating U.S. deaths from 2005 to 2050, focusing on the W's: who, what, when, where, how, and why. The data shows a unimodal distribution of deaths, with a mean of 8.89 thousand and a median of 8.82 thousand, indicating a roughly symmetrical trend without outliers. There is confusion regarding the W's, with one participant questioning if their initial definitions align with the histogram and data presented. Clarification reveals that there are no strict guidelines for defining the W's, suggesting that the original definitions may still be valid despite differing interpretations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding statistical data representation in the context of AP statistics.
Shay10825
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
For this set of data is this correct?
http://img41.exs.cx/img41/3033/data1.jpg
The W’s:
Who: People in the United States of America
What: Number estimated to die
When: 2005 to 2050
Where: United States of America
How: By conducting a census and predicting the deaths based on previous death trends
Why: To find out how many people are estimated to die in the years 2005 to 2050 in the United States of America.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
looks right, at first I thought you were asking if the chart was correct, that threw me off.
 
Is this wrong for this set of data and the W's?

The Deaths of the US population (in thousands) is unimodal with the mode between 8.25 and 8.5 thousand deaths (See Figure 1.1). The data is roughly symmetrical, and is slightly skewed to the right with no outliers. The data has a median of 8.82, which means that half of the deaths lie above 8.82 thousand and half of them lie below 8.82 thousand. The range of the data is 9.6 thousand -8.25 thousand or 1.35 thousand deaths, and the IQR is 9.46 thousand - 8.35 thousand or 1.11 thousand deaths. The data has a mean of 8.89 thousand deaths, and a standard deviation of .52 thousand deaths between the years of 2005 and 2050. The mean and standard deviation are good to use for this set of data because it is roughly symmetric and it does not have any outliers. There aren’t any unusual features about the data.

http://img47.exs.cx/img47/7939/histo.jpg
 
I was asking because someone told me that my W's were wrong and they should be:

Who: Projected deaths for 2005-2050 in 25,000 intervals
What: Number of years that predicted each interval
When: 2005 to 2050
Where: The United States of America
How: By conducting a census and predicting the deaths based on previous death trends
Why: To show which predictions were made most frequently
 
I didn't even know there were set guidelines as to who who was, and what what was.
 
It's for my ap statistics class. There really are not specific guidelines for them. Someone just told me that my W's did not match my histogram and data. Is what I did wrong?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top