Stem cells from infants for research

AI Thread Summary
Stem cells are primarily sourced from embryos, not infants, as they are pluripotent and can develop into any cell type in the body. However, embryonic stem cells are limited in availability due to their extraction from discarded IVF embryos. Adult stem cells exist in the body but are not pluripotent, restricting their regenerative capabilities. Research into inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is promising, as these are normal cells reprogrammed to behave like embryonic stem cells. Despite potential risks, such as cancerous mutations from current reprogramming techniques, advancements are being made to improve efficiency and safety. The future of stem cell research holds significant potential for medical breakthroughs, particularly in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
So we use stem cells from infants for research, but do they never take those stem cells and use it to treat people, is it not possible to make cells from other people live in your body? would your body reject and kill those cells?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Jarfi said:
So we use stem cells from infants for research, but do they never take those stem cells and use it to treat people, is it not possible to make cells from other people live in your body? would your body reject and kill those cells?
Stem cells aren't taken from infants but harvested from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_embryogenesis. These stem cells are desirable because they are pluripotent meaning they can give rise to any cell in an adult body. Downsides are that embryonic stem cells are always going to be in short supply because to get them you have to use discarded embryos from IVF treatments, you cannot fertilise a human egg for research.

You do raise a good point about using cells already in the body. First thing to mention would be that we do have adult stem cells (adult in this context means anything after birth) which live in our bodies and naturally give rise to different cell types. The problem is adult stem cells are not pluripotent and can only give rise to a few cell types, locating a useful adult stem cell and using it is difficult but an active research goal. Secondly is a very exciting field of research into inducible pluripotent stem cells. iPSCs are normal cells that are "reprogrammed" into pluripotent stem cells. So far methods to do this are potentially dangerous because they involve inserting DNA sequences into the genomes and so could cause cancerous mutations (although in recent years advances are removing this problem
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7239/abs/nature07864.html). Also the methods are abysmally inefficient producing very low amounts of cells.

However the field has great potential and is advancing along many different lines, for my money far better control of cell behaviour (tissue engineering) and reliable, efficient iPSC production will near-revolutionise medicine.
 
Last edited:
What about stem cells in a person's cardiac tissue? http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/02/15/MNFG1N7GR0.DTL
 
Last edited:
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top