Step Down Transformers and Power Distribution - Help

AI Thread Summary
Power generation plants step up voltage to 500kV or more to minimize transmission losses, allowing for efficient delivery of energy to the grid. Once the voltage is stepped down to 132kV for distribution, there are concerns about power loss due to lower voltage levels, but transformers conserve power by inversely adjusting current. While some losses occur through inefficiencies in transformers, they are generally around 95% efficient. Designing distribution systems involves balancing economic factors, safety, and the physical requirements of infrastructure, such as wire thickness and tower size. Ultimately, not all generated power reaches consumers, and the efficiency of power distribution systems varies based on these design considerations.
mathological
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

so I have been having sleepless nights about this concept.

From what I understand, say a typical power generating plant that produces 2000MW of energy, for example, will want to transmit as much of 2000 MW of power to the grid as possible and they do so by stepping up the voltages to 500kV or more in order to reduce transmission losses.

Now let's get down to what happens once the distribution company gets this power. Say the voltage is stepped down to 132kV from 500kV.

Now my question is, since there is a huge reduction in voltage, won't that mean that there will be significant loss in power as well due to P = VI?

So what I am saying is that let's say the grid transmits 500 MW of the 2000 MW they receive to one of the distribution companies/utility, then when distribution company distributes at lower voltages, won't that mean they will be distributing much less than 500 MW due to low voltage levels (by low voltage here I mean below 132kV, i.e 33kV, 22kV, 11kV, 415V, etc)? (I am talking about losses due to lower voltage levels due to P = VI, on top of the heat losses)?

Thanks for your help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The stepping up and stepping down is done by a transformer. The way a transformer works, whatever change is done to the voltage, the inverse is done to the current. Double the voltage, and the current is halved. Halve the voltage, and the current is doubled. This conserves power. There are some small power losses through eddy currents, hysteresis, flux leakage, wire resistance, etc, but overall transformers are very efficient. I believe around 95% or so.
 
Last edited:
The losses at the lower voltages do not have to be higher than at high voltages. You just have to use thicker wires to carry the current.

The question is how much of this thicker wire you can provide economically.

There are good reasons for having lower voltages at street level and high voltages in the long distance lines from the power station.

How you balance these needs is a matter of design. High voltages use big towers, big insulators and big transformers and all this costs money.

Against this, you need the relative safety of 120 volts (or whatever) for your house, so you have to accept that this will be expensive in copper wire but more economical on towers etc.

So, designing distribution systems is always a matter of economics, among other considerations.
 
Jiggy-Ninja said:
The stepping up and stepping down is done by a transformer. The way a transformer works, whatever change is done to the voltage, the inverse is done to the current. Double the voltage, and the current is halved. Halve the voltage, and the current is doubled. This conserves power. There are some small power losses through eddy currents, hysteresis, flux leakage, wire resistance, etc, but overall transformers are very efficient. I believe around 95% or so.

cool! understood! Thanks.
 
vk6kro said:
The losses at the lower voltages do not have to be higher than at high voltages. You just have to use thicker wires to carry the current.

The question is how much of this thicker wire you can provide economically.

There are good reasons for having lower voltages at street level and high voltages in the long distance lines from the power station.

How you balance these needs is a matter of design. High voltages use big towers, big insulators and big transformers and all this costs money.

Against this, you need the relative safety of 120 volts (or whatever) for your house, so you have to accept that this will be expensive in copper wire but more economical on towers etc.

So, designing distribution systems is always a matter of economics, among other considerations.

Right! Ok so when people tell us that a certain power station provides 2000 MW, then not all of this 2000 MW gets to the consumer. Does anyone know how efficient a typical power distribution system is (in terms of what is being output at a generating station say 2000 MW and what the consumers are receiving)?
 
short circuit makes u have to go for a higher capacity wire. Sometimes the reason why we step up is because the wire we using will not be able to withstand a short circuit
 
But very heavy critics sometimes makes u give up
 
Back
Top