Step Potential with incident and reflected waves

baubletop
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A woman is walking along a road. She has a mass of 52 kg and is walking at 1 m/s.

(a) She is not paying careful attention and is walking straight towards the wall of a nearby building. Assume that the wall is infinitely hard and that she can be described as a plane wave (a free particle). As she “bounces” off the wall, her incident
and reflected wave functions interfere. What is the spacing of the nodes in her |Ψ|2 ?

(b) Next, she approaches a curb of height 25 cm and steps down over it. Quantum mechanically she
 has a finite probability of bouncing off (being reflected off) the curb. What is her reflection coefficient?

(c) In (b) above, what is her momentum if we find that she was reflected backwards by the downward edge of the curb?

Homework Equations


Schrödinger (I'm guessing), general forms of solutions of incident/reflected waves?
k1 = √(2mE)/ħ
k2 = √(2m(E-v0))/ħ

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried a couple different things to no avail... We discussed general situations with k1 and k2 but I'm totally at a loss as to how to apply it to this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post what you have worked out in more detail, so we can provide some guidance in this peculiar but intriguing exercise.
Offhand you can guess that a will yield puny distances and b a puny probability. h is really small in daily life !
 
I believe you are being asked to treat her as a point particle. The 25 cm will allow you to compute the potential difference of the step along with her mass and the value of the gravitational field. You also need to show your work and what you tried in more detail in order for us to know exactly where your problem lies.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top