Stepper motor just vibrates in CCW

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting a 5-wire unipolar stepper motor (J835L) that vibrates but does not rotate counterclockwise (CCW). The user initially connected the motor to a ULN2003A driver and successfully achieved clockwise (CW) rotation using a specific stepping sequence. However, attempts to reverse the rotation resulted in only vibration. Suggestions included adjusting the wiring sequence and trying half-stepping to improve torque, as well as manually testing each coil to find the correct sequence. Ultimately, the user discovered that waiting for the switches to engage properly allowed for correct rotation in both directions.
toomy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a 5-wire unipolar J835L. I have not been able to find the datasheet on it, but I have found this diagram:

293yi5j.jpg


also, the motor has the following information printed on its label:

Uni-Polar, Bi-Filar
120 Ohms
7.5° per step

I have connected a ULN2003A between the uC and the motor
where i connect the wires purple, blue, yellow then orange

I drove the circuit in order
1 00000001
2 00000100
3 00000010
4 00001000
and than return back again
I set each step and then wait for 100ms

this was working successfully but when i tried to reverse the rotation so it rotate in CCw the motor just vibrate and do not move as the CW .
Can anyone give me a pointer?

regards
toomy
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
toomy,

Shortcut for finding the proper wiring sequence

Connect the center tap(s) to the power source (or current-Limiting resistor.) Connect the remaining 4 wires in any pattern. If it doesn't work, you only need try these 2 swaps...

1 2 4 8 - (arbitrary first wiring order)
1 2 8 4 - switch end pair
1 8 2 4 - switch middle pair

You're finished when the motor turns smoothly in either direction. If the motor turns in the opposite direction from desired, reverse the wires so that ABCD would become DCBA.

taken from: http://www.stepperworld.com/Tutorials/pgUnipolarTutorial.htm

You might give that a try. You might also go to the link for a very good tutorial.

Fish
 
thank you fish
I tried your suggest but it is not working

However, I found the correct way to run it
it just have to wait the other switches so it rotate correctly
1 00001000
2 00001010
3 00000010
4 00000110
5 00000100
6 00000101
7 00000001
 
Without trying to reverse engineer this whole thread ... Your last pattern looks like it does half-step operation, whereas the original pattern is simple full-step. Half-step gives a little extra boost to the output torque because (half the time) it energizes two coils. So maybe your motor is sticky in one direction for some reason?

Otherwise I think you still have the wrong wiring sequence. I usually just do an exhaustive search by powering each coil by hand -- briefly connect two wires from the power-supply to each coil and see what the motor does. Then check a few sequences, if the motor jerks back and forth you have the wrong sequence but if it moves in one direction without hesitation you've probably discovered the right sequence. Once you've got one right sequence, just reversing that order should go the other direction. I haven't tried Fish's test protocol but it sounds like it's an logical minimization of my brute force methodology and it should work.

If you have another motor, give it a try to see if it behaves the same.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...

Similar threads

Back
Top