Still learning dimensional analysis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dimensional analysis of the expression 2ωc/√G, where ω is angular frequency, c is the speed of light, and G is the gravitational constant. The user initially questions whether this expression has dimensions of force. After analysis, it is clarified that the dimensions do not correspond to force but rather yield a more complex dimensional result. The conversation suggests that squaring the quantity may reveal a common physical dimension, hinting at a deeper understanding of the derived dimensions. Ultimately, the expression represents a new type of quantity that does not directly align with standard physical dimensions.
help1please
Messages
167
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



angular frequency omega, speed of light and gravitational constant


Homework Equations



Just the expression,

\frac{2 \omega c}{\sqrt{G}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Still learning dimensional analysis. So I am simply wanting to know if I have done this right. If I have, I get

\frac{2 \omega c}{\sqrt{G}}

this with dimensions of force, right?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


help1please said:

Homework Statement



angular frequency omega, speed of light and gravitational constant


Homework Equations



Just the expression,

\frac{2 \omega c}{\sqrt{G}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Still learning dimensional analysis. So I am simply wanting to know if I have done this right. If I have, I get

\frac{2 \omega c}{\sqrt{G}}

this with dimensions of force, right?

Thanks in advance.

I'll use square brackets around a quantity to mean, "dimensions of" that quantity (which is a fairly common notation, I think). Then:

[ω] = time-1

[c] = length * time-1

[√G] = [G]1/2 = (force * length2 * mass-2)1/2

Therefore [ωcG-1/2] = length * time-2 * force-1/2 * length-1 * mass

= force-1/2 * mass * time-2

= (mass * length * time-2)-1/2 * mass * time-2

= mass1/2 * length-1/2 * time-1

So, no, it doesn't have dimensions of force.
 


What does it have dimensions of then? I mean, other than what you have said, is there a commonly known dimension it exhibits? like energy for instance?
 


It doesn't correspond to any common physical quantity, and there is no reason that it has to (you've simply come across a new type of quantity),

However, the *square* of the quantity is a common type of quantity. Hint: square everything in blue, and rearrange things to produce "force" plus some leftover stuff. What is the dimension of the quantity you've come up with?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top