Stirling Approximation for a thermodynamic system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the Stirling approximation to calculate the ratio of ways to distribute N particles in a thermodynamic system. Participants clarify the correct form of the Stirling approximation and address algebraic errors in the calculations. The correct ratio simplifies to a form that includes the expression (0.40.40.60.6/0.5)n, highlighting the importance of proper exponent distribution. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful algebraic manipulation to achieve the desired asymptotic form. Overall, the thread illustrates the collaborative effort to resolve misunderstandings in mathematical derivations.
Demroz
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The stirling approximation, J! = √JJ+1/2e-J, is very handy when dealing with numbers larger than about 100. consider the following ratio: the number of ways N particles can be evenly divided between two halves of a room to the number of ways they can be divided with 60% on the right and 40% on the left.

a. Show using the stirling approximation that the ratio is approximately (0.40.40.60.6/5)n

Homework Equations



N!/NR!(N - NR)!

J! = √JJ+1/2e-J

The Attempt at a Solution



So i figured out the ratio to be
(0.5n)!(0.4n)!/(0.5n)!

Then by using the stirling approximation I get

0.6n0.6n+1/20.4n0.4n+1/2 / 0.25nn+1

all of my attempts so far have given me that answer which simplifies to 24/25. can you guys point me in the right direction/show me what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Demroz said:
J! = √JJ+1/2e-J
No, it's ##J^Je^{-J}\sqrt{2\pi J}##. For the present problem the ##2\pi## doesn't matter since it will cancel, but the square root you have at the front is definitely wrong.
Demroz said:
So i figured out the ratio to be
(0.5n)!(0.4n)!/(0.5n)!
A typo in there?
Demroz said:
0.6n0.6n+1/20.4n0.4n+1/2 / 0.25nn+1
Not exactly sure what you mean by that since you've left out all the parentheses, but the 0.25 looks wrong. Please post your working, including all necessary parentheses.
 
Sorry about that, I screwed up a lot of things in typing it out

JJ+0.5e-J√2pi

My work

probability for a 50/50 distribution is

(N!)/((0.5N)!(0.5N)!)

probability for a 40/60 distribution

(N!)/((0.4N)!(0.6N)!)

when you divide 50/50 over 40/60 you get

((0.4N)!(0.6N)!)/((0.5N)!)2

So when I plug into the stirling approximation (I reworked it from the previous attempt)

((0.4n0.4n)(0.6n0.6n))/((2-n-1)(nn+1))

Which I was able to simplify to:

(0.40.4n0.60.6n)(2n+1)(n-n)

I have no idea where to go from here
 
Demroz said:
((0.4N)!(0.6N)!)/((0.5N)!)2
Agreed.
So when I plug into the stirling approximation (I reworked it from the previous attempt)

((0.4n0.4n)(0.6n0.6n))/((2-n-1)(nn+1))
That's not what I get. Please post all your working.
Demroz said:
I have no idea where to go from here
You can see from the question what form is required. After correcting the algebra so far, can you find a way to extract the n exponent to be outside as in the desired answer:
(0.40.40.60.6/5)n
You will find there is a constant factor that the n exponent does not apply to, but for these sorts of questions you don't have to worry about that. It's the asymptotic form that matters. E.g. 0.1n may be considered an approximation to 1000*0.1n for large n.
But btw, that answer is incorrect. It should be (0.40.40.60.6/0.5)n
 
I found what I did wrong, thank you very much for the help. It was a simple algebra mistake when distributing exponents
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top