Stoichiometry Help: Find Empirical Formula & O2 Used

  • Thread starter Thread starter bubbles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
To find the empirical formula of the hydrocarbon and the grams of O2 used, the moles of CO, CO2, and H2O produced must be calculated first. The user calculated 0.017 moles of CO, 0.017 moles of CO2, and 0.025 moles of H2O. By determining the moles of carbon and hydrogen from these values, the empirical formula C2H3 was derived. The total mass of O2 used in the reaction was found to be 1.19 grams. Understanding the mole relationships in the reaction is crucial for solving stoichiometry problems like this.
bubbles
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hi. I need help on a stoichiometry problem:

When a particular hydrocarbon was burned in air, 0.467g of CO, 0.733g of CO2, and .450g of H2O were formed.

The question asks me to find the empirical formula of the hydrocarbon and the number of grams of O2 used in the reaction. The answers are C2H3(empirical formula) and 1.19g of O2, but I don't understand how to get the answers.

So far, I tried to find the empirical formula by finding out the number of moles of each compound. I got .017 mol Co, .017 mol CO2, and .025 mol water. So using this information, I was able to get a chemical equation of
Unknown Hydrocarbon + 9O_2 \rightarrow 4CO + 4CO_2 + 6H_2O
But I don't know how to get the empirical formula from that.

Is this the correct step to take? Or should I try something else? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you should do is find the amount of moles of each component in the hydrocarbon. You have the moles for CO, CO2 and H20, now you can find the moles of each component (C, H).
 
Thank you, Ultima9999.:smile:
 
this problem is relatively tough...did you get the ans. or do you need help?
 
I got the answer after finding the mol of each element (I forgot to do that before!). Yeah, this problem was a tough one and took me a while to solve.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top