Strain Gauging Assistance Required

  • Thread starter Thread starter george1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assistance Strain
AI Thread Summary
For optimal strain gauging on a cantilever beam, it's recommended to use a triple gauge rosette to minimize errors related to mounting angle and temperature sensitivity. The gauges should be strategically placed to capture strain effectively, with orientation depending on the specific loading conditions. Mounting all gauges parallel to the beam's length or a combination of parallel and perpendicular orientations can be considered based on the analysis requirements. Understanding I-Y-I tabs is crucial for effective strain measurement, as they help in aligning gauges accurately. Proper placement and orientation of the gauges are essential for reliable strain data.
george1989
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All

I am a mechanical engineering student and require to attach a full Wheatstone bridge to the underside of a cantilever beam, 103x27x5 mm LxWxH. Where would be the best location to mount the gauges?, also in which orientation should I mount them? All parallel to the length of the beam? All perpendicular? 2 parallel, 2 perpendicular? Also I have been reading a bit about I-Y-I tabs used for strain gauging and am a bit lost.

Any help / direction to relevant information would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

George
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This may help.

http://www.omega.com/techref/pdf/StrainGage_Measurement.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you using a rosette or a single gauge? If you are using a single gauge, you will notice that it is designed to work in one direction. Using two gauges are mounted in the single gauge solution because they are very sensitive to temperature changes. The angle that it is bonded to the surface is very critical for reliable results. I recommend using a triple gauge rosette to get rid of any errors associated with mounting angle.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top