Strange Change of Variable of Integration

Recipi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I've been following a few derivations for quantities in classical mechanics of rotating systems, and one of the integrals is transformed in a way I've never seen before. For angle theta, angular velocity omega and angular acceleration alpha:
t%7D%5C%20d%5Comega%20%3D%20%5Cint_%7B%5Comega_i%7D%5E%7B%5Comega_f%7D%20%5Comega%5C%20d%5Comega.gif


Intuitively I can see that they've 'just' swapped the differential on top with the one trailing the integral and adapted the variables denoting the initial and final values accordingly, but could anybody point me to a more in-depth explanation of this? The notes gloss over the step and it seems like it could be a useful trick to bear in mind generally.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that, between 2 and 3, you may write:
d\theta=\frac{d\theta}{dt}dt=\omega{dt}
You then make the variable change:
\frac{d\omega}{dt}dt=d\omega
 
Whenever you see people using change of variable (in integrals), or separating variables (in diff eq) and/or messing around with differentials in any way, it is always a shortcut way of applying the chain rule. You have the further slight complication here re the connections between ##\alpha, \omega \text{ and } \theta##. Or perhaps it is an opportunity rather than a complication.

What Arildno wrote should show you the path.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top