Strange Nucleation Sites Inside a Diet Pepsi Bottle?

AI Thread Summary
Strange nucleation sites have been observed inside the top area of Diet Pepsi bottles, specifically the 1.25-liter size, appearing upon opening or after the first drink. The discussion revolves around the nature of these sites, questioning whether they are caused by manufacturing processes or represent surface irregularities. Some participants argue that these sites may not be true nucleation points, as they do not involve a phase transition, but rather are areas where carbon dioxide can escape more easily. The analogy to mentos is made, suggesting that similar surface properties may contribute to gas release. Further testing and exploration of these phenomena are planned to clarify their characteristics and origins.
GraphicNerdity333
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have found some odd Nucleation points that appear inside of the top area of a bottle of Diet Pepsi (the area right near the cap as shown in pictures below).
Snapchat-1697212459.jpg
The nucleation sites appear either as soon as you open the bottle, or after the first drink (I will test this once more and see exactly when it happens and will update this thread). I have only seen this on the 1.25 liter bottles, but have not looked specifically for them on the regular bottles or the 1 liter bottles. I have not tested this with regular Pepsi, but only diet at the moment. Further testing will ensue, and this thread will remain updated. My questions are: what causes these Nucleation sites? Are these put in by the manufacturer (and if so, what purpose do they serve)? What exactly are they (scratches, tiny irregularities, dust, saliva, etc.)? Why do they only appear near the top, while the rest of the bottle does not have them(as shown below)?
Snapchat-1697212459.jpg
Snapchat-548894044.jpg
Snapchat-49386621.jpg
Are they even nucleation sites (I assume they are because of the way the diet Pepsi is able to stick to them, and the way they cause the diet Pepsi to release small amounts of carbon), or am I misinterpreting what I am seeing? Any and all answers would be helpful.
 

Attachments

  • Snapchat-548894044.jpg
    Snapchat-548894044.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 789
  • Snapchat-1697212459.jpg
    Snapchat-1697212459.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 1,199
  • Snapchat-49386621.jpg
    Snapchat-49386621.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 703
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Do I understand you correctly that by "nucleation sites" you mean places where the droplets of the liquid stay on the internal surface of bottle?

I am not sure I would not call them "nucleation sites" as IMHO nucleation typically refers to the phase transition process and there is no phase transition here, you start with a liquid and the liquid is present all the time. Then, there is kind of resemblance of what is happening to the nucleation processes, apparently plastic surface is not homogeneous.

My bet is that it is some side effect of the bottle production process. Most likely these inhomogeneities are initially present on the whole surface, but whatever causes them gets dissolved in the Pepsi.
 
Borek said:
Do I understand you correctly that by "nucleation sites" you mean places where the droplets of the liquid stay on the internal surface of bottle?

I am not sure I would not call them "nucleation sites" as IMHO nucleation typically refers to the phase transition process and there is no phase transition here, you start with a liquid and the liquid is present all the time. Then, there is kind of resemblance of what is happening to the nucleation processes, apparently plastic surface is not homogeneous.

My bet is that it is some side effect of the bottle production process. Most likely these inhomogeneities are initially present on the whole surface, but whatever causes them gets dissolved in the Pepsi.

That makes a lot of sense to me. The reason I thought of them as Nucleation points is because they are able to draw the carbon dioxide out of the diet Pepsi (much like mentos but at a much much MUCH slower rate. I tried to include a video of this, but could not) when the diet Pepsi is in contact with them. I had heard that the surface of mentos were covered in tiny pores that acted as Nucleation sites. Would this new information still be consistent with your theory?
 
As I wrote - what you observe is in a way related to the processes in which we use the name "nucleation site", so the analogy is OK, I just don't think I have ever seen the name "nucleation sites" used in such a context.

Actually it is not just pores that are important, it is more about places where some surface property is discontinuous. It can be a difference in curvature (pores and bumps), it can be a difference in hydrophilicicty or hydrophobicity, it can even be something as small as crystallographic defect. Not every such place will serve as a nucleation site, some will behave as "antinucleation sites".

GraphicNerdity333 said:
Would this new information still be consistent with your theory?

Yes, it is all perfectly consistent.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top