Strenght of Square Tubing on a trailer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the structural integrity of a three-car gooseneck trailer featuring main beams measuring 4" x 4" x 3/16". Users express concerns about the strength of these dimensions, particularly given the beams' length of 41 feet and their configuration, which includes a 43" vertical jog and a 50" horizontal span. The weld quality is noted as deep and well-penetrated, which contributes positively to the overall strength. However, the consensus indicates that while these dimensions may be adequate for lighter loads, they may not provide sufficient support for heavier applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural engineering principles related to load-bearing beams
  • Familiarity with gooseneck trailer design and specifications
  • Knowledge of welding techniques and their impact on structural integrity
  • Experience with material strength analysis, particularly for steel tubing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the load capacity of 4" x 4" x 3/16" square tubing under various conditions
  • Explore alternative materials or dimensions for trailer main beams
  • Learn about the effects of weld quality on structural performance
  • Investigate best practices for reinforcing trailer frames for heavier loads
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for trailer manufacturers, structural engineers, and individuals involved in trailer design and construction, particularly those focused on ensuring safety and load capacity in gooseneck trailers.

Bluewater0650
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am considering purchasing a type of three car gooseneck trailer. The question is the "main" beams of the trailer are 4" X 4" X 3/16", this seems a little flimsy to me. I measured them and they are 41' long then take a 43" jog vertical, then another 50" horizontal. Typical goosneck style,the welds are deep and well penetrated
I have included some pics, and would greatly appreciate any input
 

Attachments

  • !Bugrqv!CGk~$(KGrHqJ,!hQEv1+0B,tpBM!qWORiZg~~_35.jpg
    !Bugrqv!CGk~$(KGrHqJ,!hQEv1+0B,tpBM!qWORiZg~~_35.jpg
    16 KB · Views: 556
  • !Bugri5!BWk~$(KGrHqV,!g0Ev1+0DB-oBM!qV+NIY!~~_35 nnnnnnnnnn.jpg
    !Bugri5!BWk~$(KGrHqV,!g0Ev1+0DB-oBM!qV+NIY!~~_35 nnnnnnnnnn.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 493
Engineering news on Phys.org
I guess I should have been more clear. Does 4x4x3/16 seem strong enough as the main support of a unit like this?
 
Thanks, for the input, very helpful group here
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
28K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
68K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K