I Stress Energy Tensor for Oscillator: Setup for Electron in E-Field

Devin
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
How would one go about setting up the stress energy tensor for a particle, say an electron subjected to electric an electric field that makes the particle oscillate with frequency \omega?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Devin said:
How would one go about setting up the stress energy tensor for a particle

Strictly speaking, a point particle doesn't have a stress-energy tensor. The SET describes a continuous distribution of matter/energy. However, you can finesse this by using delta functions, as shown here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress–energy_tensor#Stress.E2.80.93energy_in_special_situations

However, as that article says, the SET given there is for a non-interacting particle. I don't think you can consistently formulate an SET for just a charged particle in an electric field. You would have to include the stress-energy in the field as well, and to be self-consistent you would have to also construct a charge-current 4-vector to describe the particle and solve Maxwell's Equations, and verify that your solution of Maxwell's Equations gave you the fields you used to construct the SET.

It would help to have more information about why you want to do this.
 
I'm just in my beginning stages of learning the theory. I've derived just about everything, but i don't understand the stress tensor, or how to construct it. I would like to be able to solve problems, and this is one that came to mind.
 
Devin said:
I'm just in my beginning stages of learning the theory.

What theory? SR? GR? What sources have you used? How did this particular problem occur to you?

I'm asking because the problem you're asking about is not one that is normally encountered as an exercise in relativity textbooks; they usually ask about stress-energy tensors that are much easier to define and work with, such as the SET of a perfect fluid.
 
GR is what I'm working out of. Misner, Lewis, and plenty of YouTube lectures. It was simply a construct that I had imagined...

PeterDonis said:
What theory? SR? GR? What sources have you used? How did this particular problem occur to you?

I'm asking because the problem you're asking about is not one that is normally encountered as an exercise in relativity textbooks; they usually ask about stress-energy tensors that are much easier to define and work with, such as the SET of a perfect fluid.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top