Stress Tensor Homework: Finding Traction Vector

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating traction vectors from a stress tensor. The key point is that traction vectors correspond to the rows of the stress tensor, which represent surfaces normal to the coordinate axes. The user attempted to find a traction vector using a unit normal vector that forms equal angles with the axes but initially received unexpected results. It was clarified that while there are three specific traction vectors from the tensor's rows, the user's normal vector does not align with the basis vectors, leading to different results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the stress tensor and traction vectors.
racnna
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/9577/stresstensor.png

Homework Equations


'traction vectors' are just the rows of the stress tensor. that is, the first row of the stress tensor(the i-component of the tensor) is the first traction vector, second row is the second,etc.
traction vector equation is
<b>t<sub>n</sub></b>=<b>n</b> dot <b>T</b>


The Attempt at a Solution



I was trying to find a surface whose normal vector forms the same angle with the three coordinate axes. and then dot this normal vector with the stress tensor in order to determine the traction vector. but the result i get is not any of the three given traction vectors
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
uh oh...58 views and no replies? i am positive you experts have encountered stuff like this...there are much harder problems on this forum! if it helps, please IGNORE my post about relevant equations and just focus on the problem statement

alright...and let me know if there's any confusion about the problem statement
 
racnna said:
I was trying to find a surface whose normal vector forms the same angle with the three coordinate axes. and then dot this normal vector with the stress tensor in order to determine the traction vector. but the result i get is not any of the three given traction vectors

What result do you get? Why do you think there are only 3 traction vectors?

racnna said:
uh oh...58 views and no replies? i am positive you experts have encountered stuff like this...there are much harder problems on this forum! if it helps, please IGNORE my post about relevant equations and just focus on the problem statement

alright...and let me know if there's any confusion about the problem statement

Please exercise some patience. Most students are still on summer break, and homework helpers do not check the forum as frequently. None of us are paid to help you, it is just something we choose to do in our free time.
 
woah easy there. I didnt mean to offend you. I just got worried because there were so many views and no replies so i thought there was a problem with the way the problem is worded.

I think there's an infinite number of traction vectors?...but the rows of the Tensor should give you three traction vectors?

i used the unit vector \frac {1}{√3}, \frac {1}{√3}, \frac {1}{√3} and dotted this with the stress tensor to get the traction vector they are asking for. Is that correct?
 
racnna said:
I think there's an infinite number of traction vectors?...but the rows of the Tensor should give you three traction vectors?

Yes. The 3 rows of the stress tensor correspond to traction vectors for surfaces normal to one of the 3 basis coordinates. Your surface normal isn't directed along any of the basis vectors (i, j, k) though, so there is no reason to expect the traction vector to be one of those rows.

i used the unit vector \frac {1}{√3}, \frac {1}{√3}, \frac {1}{√3} and dotted this with the stress tensor to get the traction vector they are asking for. Is that correct?

Yes. :approve:
 
Aha! thanks so much gabba
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top