String Theory-Virasoro Generators -- show commutator relation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 3K views
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



(I have dropped the hats on the ##\alpha_{n}^{u}## operators and ##L_{m}##)

##[\alpha_{n}^u, \alpha_m^v]=n\delta_{n+m}\eta^{uv}##
##L_m=\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} : \alpha_{m-n}^u\alpha_{n}^v: \eta_{uv}-\delta_{m,0}##

where : denotes normal-ordered.

Show that : ##[\alpha_{m}^u,L_n]=m\alpha_{m+n}^u##

Homework Equations



see above

The Attempt at a Solution



For a given ##n## we are looking at the following commutator: ##[\alpha_m,\alpha_{n-m}\alpha_m]##

to use commutator relation:

##[a,bc]=-a[b,c]-[a,c]b##

##a= \alpha_m##
##b= \alpha_{n-m}##
##c= \alpha_m ##

##[a,c]=0##
##[b,c]=(n-m)\delta_{n=0}\eta^{uv}## using (1)

##\implies [\alpha_{m}^u,L_n]=\alpha_m^u(m)\eta^{uv} ## which is wrong...

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump please. many thanks in advance, very grateful.
 
king vitamin said:
The commutator relation you've written down is wrong.

Sorry to re-bump an old thread but I thought it would be a waste to start a new one.
I think I understood this at the time but right now I am not getting it.
Why is the commutator relation wrong?

Let me instead use:

##[a,bc]=[a,b]c+b[a,c]##

##a=\alpha_m##
##b=\alpha_{n-m}##
##c=\alpha_m##

##[\alpha_m, \alpha_{n-m}]\alpha_m + \alpha_{m-n}[\alpha_m,\alpha_m] = m\delta_n \eta^{uv}\alpha_m + m\delta_{2m}\eta^{uv}##

which is wrong..
 
You shouldn't use the same index [itex]m[/itex] for both the [itex]\alpha_m[/itex] and the summed index in the definition of [itex]L_n[/itex].

So using the (now correct) relation

[tex][a,bc] = [a,b]c + b[a,c][/tex]

with

[tex] a = \alpha_m^u \\<br /> <br /> b = \alpha_{n-k}^{\nu} \\<br /> <br /> c = \alpha_k^{\alpha}[/tex]

you should get the correct answer after contracting with [itex]\eta_{\nu \alpha}[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: binbagsss