Struggling with the rules behind electricity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kuzon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electricity Rules
AI Thread Summary
A moving particle experiences a decrease in kinetic energy from 9480 eV to 8260 eV while transitioning from an electric potential of -43.0 V to +25.0 V. The discussion clarifies that despite negative charges typically moving from low to high voltage, the positive charge in this scenario loses kinetic energy as it moves from negative to positive voltage. This indicates that the particle must be positively charged, as it behaves contrary to the usual flow of negative charges. The conversation emphasizes that the electric field dictates the force on the charge, influencing its motion. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the rules of electricity.
Kuzon
Messages
42
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A moving particle encounters an external electric field that decreases its kinetic energy from 9480 eV to 8260 eV as the particle moves from position A to position B. The electric potential atA is -43.0 V, and that at B is +25.0 V. Determine the charge of the particle. Include the algebraic sign (+ or -) with your answer

Homework Equations


deltaE = q*deltaV

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the solution correct using that formula, I was just wondering why the solution is positive? I thought NEGATIVE charge should flow from low (-43.0 V) to high (+25.0 V) voltage.

Also, does anyone know any good resources to learn the rules of electricity e.g. electrons flow from negative to positive
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right. In normal conditions, negative charge should flow from low to high voltage. In that case the charge would gain kinetic energy at the expense of potential energy.
But if we force a positive charge to go from negative voltage to positive voltage, it will go as desired by losing its kinetic energy. Look at the problem statement, that is exactly the case. Kinetic energy of the charge particle has decreased. So, it should be positive charge which has moved.
So it's not the normal case as you think. I hope it helped.
 
  • Like
Likes Kuzon
Astik said:
Yes, you are right. In normal conditions, negative charge should flow from low to high voltage. In that case the charge would gain kinetic energy at the expense of potential energy.
But if we force a positive charge to go from negative voltage to positive voltage, it will go as desired by losing its kinetic energy. Look at the problem statement, that is exactly the case. Kinetic energy of the charge particle has decreased. So, it should be positive charge which has moved.
So it's not the normal case as you think. I hope it helped.
Oh wow okay thanks man!
 
The key is that the field determines the direction of the force on the charge rather than the direction of motion itself. The force will cause an acceleration and that may eventually change the direction of motion but it depends on the initial conditions. It's a bit like throwing a ball upwards while gravity acts downwards.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top