Stuck on a single loop circuit, two emfs and resistor

AI Thread Summary
To determine the unknown resistance 'R' that makes the terminal-to-terminal potential difference of one of the batteries zero, the discussion revolves around the equations derived from the circuit's parameters. The user simplifies the circuit equations and finds that for battery one, 'R' equals 0.004Ω, while for battery two, it results in a negative value, which raises questions about the validity of the solution. The consensus is that a negative resistance is not physically meaningful in this context, confirming that only the positive solution for battery one is valid. Thus, the first battery is identified as the one that can have zero potential difference. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing valid solutions in circuit analysis.
scrilla103
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ε[1]=12v
internal resistance[1]=.016Ω
ε[2]=12v
internal resistance[2]=.012Ω

some unknown resistance 'R' in a stand alone resistor.

a) what value of 'R' will make the terminal-to-terminal potential difference of one of the batteries zero?
b) which battery would it be?
(picture below shows circuit)

Homework Equations


R = V/i

The Attempt at a Solution



I put together this equation:
ε[2] - ir[2] + ε - ir[1] - iR = 0
and continued to simplify to this:
i(.028 + R) = 24
The problem is I don't have a way to find 'i'...
Any ideas? This problem is marked as a three dot (harder difficulty) in my book, so I'm guessing there's an assumption I'm missing.

Thanks in advance,
Caleb
 

Attachments

  • c0ca5e78-405e-408e-9b49-bd53bfecabd5.gif
    c0ca5e78-405e-408e-9b49-bd53bfecabd5.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 576
Physics news on Phys.org
What would short circuit current be, i.e. R = 0?
 
Why solve for i?

What is the equation for voltage across E1 to be zero? E2?

Could you come up with 2 equations with 2 unknowns (i and R) for either of those?
 
Alright, I think I got it.

I set V1 = ε1 - ir1 = 0
and got ε1 = ir1
and also
ε2 = ir2

Subbing 'i' into the equation I had simplified to above produces, for emf #1, I get R to equal .004Ω (which is what the back of the book says). Doing the same for emf #2, I get -.004Ω.

My only question now is about the negative. Doesn't a negative value on a resistor mean it encourages the flow of charge? Wouldn't that mean that the battery set to zero potential could be either one, just depending on the sign of R? (The book says battery one is the answer to part b.)

Thanks,
Caleb
 
For you, there is no such thing as a negative resistor, certainly not a dc negative resistor. So your only valid solution is for E1.

You've run into this sort of thing many times before, even in high school. For example, Pythagoras says c^2 = a^2 + b^2. But that equation has two solutions for c, and you know one of them is nonsensical.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top