Stuck on Free-Fall Acceleration problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a free-fall acceleration problem involving a stone thrown downward from a height. The user is attempting to determine the time it takes for the stone to reach the ground and its speed at impact, using the appropriate kinematic formulas. The key point is that the user correctly identifies the need to set up a quadratic equation but initially struggles with the signs of the terms. The clarification provided emphasizes that all terms should reflect downward motion, leading to the correct equation for solving the quadratic. Ultimately, the user is reassured that solving the quadratic is the right approach to find the solution.
frankfjf
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
I keep trying to get this right but I keep falling short. Here's the problem:

A hoodlum throws a stone vertically downward with an initial speed of 19.0 m/s from the roof of a building, 39.0 m above the ground. (a) How long does it take the stone to reach the ground? (b) What is the speed of the stone at impact?

My professor has given us a number of formulas to use for motion problems and they are as follows:

Vf = Final Velocity, Vi = Initial Velocity, a = acceleration, t = time, d = displacement

First Formula: Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad

Second Formula: d = Vi(t) + (a/2)(t^2)

Third Formula: Vf = Vi + at

Which formula could I use to solve this problem? For part a based on what my textbook indicates it'd seem that the second formula will do it, but when I plug in the data that's given I end up with:

39m = 19t - 4.9t^2

But as you can see this doesn't give me a single variable. (Well it does, t, but I end up with a quadratic equation).

Do I just solve the quadratic or am I doing something wrong? And if I'm doing something wrong, am I using the right formula of the 3 or do I need to use a different one? Please help! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the correct formula, but all the terms should be of the same sign, positive or negative, since the displacement, initial velocity, and acceleration all have the same direction - downward.
 
Rewriting then...

-39m = -19t - 4.9t^2?

But no matter how I setup the signs I'm stuck with a quadratic. Do I just solve like a quadratic then?
 
frankfjf said:
I keep trying to get this right but I keep falling short. Here's the problem:
A hoodlum throws a stone vertically downward with an initial speed of 19.0 m/s from the roof of a building, 39.0 m above the ground. (a) How long does it take the stone to reach the ground? (b) What is the speed of the stone at impact?
My professor has given us a number of formulas to use for motion problems and they are as follows:
Vf = Final Velocity, Vi = Initial Velocity, a = acceleration, t = time, d = displacement
First Formula: Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
Second Formula: d = Vi(t) + (a/2)(t^2)
Third Formula: Vf = Vi + at
Which formula could I use to solve this problem? For part a based on what my textbook indicates it'd seem that the second formula will do it, but when I plug in the data that's given I end up with:
39m = 19t - 4.9t^2
But as you can see this doesn't give me a single variable. (Well it does, t, but I end up with a quadratic equation).
Do I just solve the quadratic or am I doing something wrong? And if I'm doing something wrong, am I using the right formula of the 3 or do I need to use a different one? Please help! Thanks!


What is wrong with having a quadratic? Solve for t. You'll get two answers, one positive, one negative. Obviously, it can't be the negative one (since that would be before the stone was thrown). So the positive one is your answer. However, your quadratic has the wrong signs. The correct equation should be:

<br /> -39=-19t-4.9t^2<br />

This is because d is the distance the stone travels, not its initial height. So if it goes 39m down, it moves -39m. If its velocity is 19 m/s down, that -19m/s. If its acceleration is 9.8 m/s^2 down, that's -9.8 m/s^2.
 
Ahh thanks. Well as long as a quadratic is fine I'm good to go. Thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top