Stuck on Free-Fall Acceleration problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a free-fall acceleration problem involving a stone thrown downward from a height. The user is attempting to determine the time it takes for the stone to reach the ground and its speed at impact, using the appropriate kinematic formulas. The key point is that the user correctly identifies the need to set up a quadratic equation but initially struggles with the signs of the terms. The clarification provided emphasizes that all terms should reflect downward motion, leading to the correct equation for solving the quadratic. Ultimately, the user is reassured that solving the quadratic is the right approach to find the solution.
frankfjf
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
I keep trying to get this right but I keep falling short. Here's the problem:

A hoodlum throws a stone vertically downward with an initial speed of 19.0 m/s from the roof of a building, 39.0 m above the ground. (a) How long does it take the stone to reach the ground? (b) What is the speed of the stone at impact?

My professor has given us a number of formulas to use for motion problems and they are as follows:

Vf = Final Velocity, Vi = Initial Velocity, a = acceleration, t = time, d = displacement

First Formula: Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad

Second Formula: d = Vi(t) + (a/2)(t^2)

Third Formula: Vf = Vi + at

Which formula could I use to solve this problem? For part a based on what my textbook indicates it'd seem that the second formula will do it, but when I plug in the data that's given I end up with:

39m = 19t - 4.9t^2

But as you can see this doesn't give me a single variable. (Well it does, t, but I end up with a quadratic equation).

Do I just solve the quadratic or am I doing something wrong? And if I'm doing something wrong, am I using the right formula of the 3 or do I need to use a different one? Please help! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the correct formula, but all the terms should be of the same sign, positive or negative, since the displacement, initial velocity, and acceleration all have the same direction - downward.
 
Rewriting then...

-39m = -19t - 4.9t^2?

But no matter how I setup the signs I'm stuck with a quadratic. Do I just solve like a quadratic then?
 
frankfjf said:
I keep trying to get this right but I keep falling short. Here's the problem:
A hoodlum throws a stone vertically downward with an initial speed of 19.0 m/s from the roof of a building, 39.0 m above the ground. (a) How long does it take the stone to reach the ground? (b) What is the speed of the stone at impact?
My professor has given us a number of formulas to use for motion problems and they are as follows:
Vf = Final Velocity, Vi = Initial Velocity, a = acceleration, t = time, d = displacement
First Formula: Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2ad
Second Formula: d = Vi(t) + (a/2)(t^2)
Third Formula: Vf = Vi + at
Which formula could I use to solve this problem? For part a based on what my textbook indicates it'd seem that the second formula will do it, but when I plug in the data that's given I end up with:
39m = 19t - 4.9t^2
But as you can see this doesn't give me a single variable. (Well it does, t, but I end up with a quadratic equation).
Do I just solve the quadratic or am I doing something wrong? And if I'm doing something wrong, am I using the right formula of the 3 or do I need to use a different one? Please help! Thanks!


What is wrong with having a quadratic? Solve for t. You'll get two answers, one positive, one negative. Obviously, it can't be the negative one (since that would be before the stone was thrown). So the positive one is your answer. However, your quadratic has the wrong signs. The correct equation should be:

<br /> -39=-19t-4.9t^2<br />

This is because d is the distance the stone travels, not its initial height. So if it goes 39m down, it moves -39m. If its velocity is 19 m/s down, that -19m/s. If its acceleration is 9.8 m/s^2 down, that's -9.8 m/s^2.
 
Ahh thanks. Well as long as a quadratic is fine I'm good to go. Thanks again!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top