Stupid Tabular Method for Integration by parts

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Is this the correct way to use the Tabular Method for
\int x^2e^{-5x}dx


repeated diff:

x^2

2x

2


repeated Integration:

e^{-5x}

-\frac{1}{5}e^{-5x}

\frac{1}{25}e^{-5x}

-\frac{1}{125}e^{-5x}


=-\frac{x^2}{5}e^{-5x}+\frac{2x}{25}e^{-5x}+\frac{2}{125}e^{-5x}+C

I hate this.

Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes but the signs of the 2nd/3rd terms are wrong.

You should write out the table and include the alternating +/-

writing it out this way might be easier to do since all you do is read across to find the terms
Code:
          [tex]e^{-5x}[/tex]
+   [tex]x^2[/tex]   [tex]\frac{-e^{-5x}}{5}[/tex]

-   [tex]2x[/tex]   [tex]\frac{e^{-5x}}{25}[/tex]
 
Then I clearly have no idea what I am doing. I am looking at the tabular method in my book, and from what i have read I take the diagonal product of x^2*(-1/5)e^{-5x} and then ADD it to the next product of 2x*(1/25)e^{-5x} and now subtract the product of 2*(-1/125)e^{-5x}

Am I off on all of them by a step?
 
OHHHH...I get it ...form the product then multiply by +1 or -1 THEN add all of the terms...that makes sense. so it is

-\frac{x^2}{5}e^{-5x}-\frac{2x}{25}e^{-5x}-\frac{2}{125}e^{-5x}+C

Casey
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top