Subgroup proof - is this even true?

1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



Prove that G cannot have a subgroup H with |H| = n - 1, where n = |G| > 2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Counter-example, the multiplicative group R and its subgroup, multiplicative group R+. Or, the additive group Z, and its subgroup of integer multiples of 2. What am I missing here? I think this is trivial for finite groups, but they don't say finite groups, they don't say anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



Prove that G cannot have a subgroup H with |H| = n - 1, where n = |G| > 2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Counter-example, the multiplicative group R and its subgroup, multiplicative group R+. Or, the additive group Z, and its subgroup of integer multiples of 2. What am I missing here? I think this is trivial for finite groups, but they don't say finite groups, they don't say anything.

Saying n=|G| implies that the group is finite and has order n. Otherwise |H| = n - 1 wouldn't make much sense.
 
OK

Thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top