Subgroups and prime order elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter wakko101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Prime
wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
The question:

Let n > 1 be a fixed integer and let G be a group. If the set H = {x in G : |x| = n} together with the identity forms a subgroup of G, what can be said about n?

I know that n must be prime, but I can't figure out why that would be. The elements of h only have order 1 or n and no others and the order of an element divides the order of the (sub)group. Are we making the assumption that since there are no other divisors of the group order, n must be prime? Or is it something else...

Any insight would be appreciated.

Cheers,
W. =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No - take integers modulo 12 (under addition) with n=4. {0,3,6,9} is a subgroup.
 
Eynstone said:
No - take integers modulo 12 (under addition) with n=4. {0,3,6,9} is a subgroup.

Is this supposed to be a counterexample? Did you account for the fact that |6|=2 since 6+6=0?
 
wakko101 said:
The question:

Let n > 1 be a fixed integer and let G be a group. If the set H = {x in G : |x| = n} together with the identity forms a subgroup of G, what can be said about n?

I know that n must be prime, but I can't figure out why that would be. The elements of h only have order 1 or n and no others and the order of an element divides the order of the (sub)group. Are we making the assumption that since there are no other divisors of the group order, n must be prime? Or is it something else...

Your intuition about n being prime is correct. As for your assumption question --- it is not an assumption; it is what you have to prove!

Try a proof by contradiction. That is, suppose n = ab with a>1 and b>1. Now consider any element h in H. Since |h|=n=ab, we have h^{ab}=(h^a)^b. Can you see how to get a contradiction out of this?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top