Subspace Topology of a Straight Line

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the subspace topology of a straight line L in the context of general topology, specifically referencing Munkres' work. It establishes that L inherits the standard topology from ℝ as a subspace of ℝl × ℝ, where ℝl denotes the lower limit topology. The conversation clarifies that while some solutions informally state that the topologies are "similar," they are actually homeomorphic, meaning they are fundamentally the same in topological terms. This distinction is crucial for understanding the relationship between one-dimensional and two-dimensional topological spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of subspace topology
  • Familiarity with homeomorphisms in topology
  • Knowledge of standard topology on ℝ
  • Basic concepts of lower limit topology (ℝl)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of homeomorphism in detail
  • Explore the properties of the lower limit topology (ℝl)
  • Review Munkres' "Topology" for deeper insights on subspace topology
  • Investigate examples of topological spaces and their homeomorphic properties
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying topology, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationships between different topological spaces.

sammycaps
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
1. Hello, I'm reading through Munkres and I was doing this problem.

16.8) If L is a straight line in the plane, describe the topology L inherits as a subspace of ℝl × ℝ and as a subspace of ℝl × ℝl (where ℝl is the lower limit topology).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've worked through it and seen many solutions online (they're all over). They essentially say that L, as a vertical line, inherits the standard topology on ℝ as a subspace of ℝl×ℝ, but some of the solutions jump from claiming that the basis sets in L are of the form {xo}×(c,d) for a vertical line L, which makes perfect sense, but then it jumps directly to saying that this implies that L inherits the standard topology, and I'm not sure I understand that (how can the topology of a 1-dimensional space be the topology on a 2-dimensional space?). Are the solutions maybe being informal, and instead mean that the topologies on L and R are "similar" (they are homeomorphic, but since homeomorphisms have not been introduced, we can't say this)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The solutions are being informal. In the context of general topology, topological spaces (and indeed, subspaces under the induced topology, as these are topological spaces in their own right) which are homeomorphic, "are" the same. And your two spaces, the real line and a vertical line as a subspace of [itex]\mathbb{R}_l \times \mathbb{R}[/itex], are indeed homeomorphic.
 
Alright, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K