Suggest a book for this statics course (exams attached)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a physics student in Europe seeking resources for a statics course that lacks clear theoretical guidance. The professor emphasizes solving problems graphically and algebraically rather than using vectors, aiming to enhance students' intuition. The student expresses confusion about this approach and requests book recommendations to better understand the course material. Participants suggest that any mechanics book could be suitable, particularly those focused on engineering principles, as statics is a branch of mechanics. They interpret the professor's preference as encouraging a mindset akin to engineering, which involves sketching and diagramming rather than relying heavily on vector algebra. The student has shared past exams to aid in finding appropriate resources and is looking for further suggestions based on those materials.
Mépris
Messages
847
Reaction score
11
Hi,

I'm currently studying physics in Europe, and am in some kind of "statics" course. It's a little unclear, as the course name is probably loosely translated from German, and the teacher didn't have any English books to recommend.

He's a great prof, but our classes are almost exclusively him going through a long problem set he assigned to us at the beginning of the semester. It's been that way for around 2.5 months, and we only have class with him once per week.

I badly need to get a book with which I can better understand the theory of what we're doing. He told us that he'd prefer we not use vectors to solve the problems, and instead, do them "graphically" (and algebraically) as that would help build a better intuition for things.

I asked him if I could upload some old exams on a forum to get some book recommendations, and he said it was OK. I've attached them to the post.

Your help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mépris said:
I badly need to get a book with which I can better understand the theory of what we're doing. He told us that he'd prefer we not use vectors to solve the problems, and instead, do them "graphically" (and algebraically) as that would help build a better intuition for things.

I don't understand that. Vectors are geometric and analytic. Does he want you to break up each equation into its parts on each plane—which is the same as using vectors...

Statics is just a branch of mechanics, so any mechanics book should be appropriate. There are also engineering books on the topic you might find beneficial.
 
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. If I recall correctly, he said that there were multiple ways to solve the problems, one of which being using the cross products, and he said he preferred the other way.

The attachments are still pending approval, so I've uploaded the files on an external host. Below is the link to two past exams. Based on this, could you/anyone else reading this, suggest appropriate books? It's very tricky for me because my understanding of the course is very shallow. We haven't covered much theory and he skips certain parts of the syllabus, so I can't really know what to learn!

https://www.mediafire.com/folder/fsiri7pzp61ie/statics
 
Mépris said:
I badly need to get a book with which I can better understand the theory of what we're doing. He told us that he'd prefer we not use vectors to solve the problems, and instead, do them "graphically" (and algebraically) as that would help build a better intuition for things.

Student100 said:
I don't understand that.
...
Statics is just a branch of mechanics, so any mechanics book should be appropriate. There are also engineering books on the topic you might find beneficial.

I would take the comment to mean he wants you to "think like an engineer," which is more about drawing sketches and diagrams than doing pages of vector algebra.

But I don't expect he want you do use really "old-school" graphical methods, and solve some of the those problems by making accurate scale drawings (by hand, not with a CAD package)! But when it was done that way in real life, the more intuition and insight you could get just be looking at the situation, the less you needed to draw.
 
AlephZero said:
I would take the comment to mean he wants you to "think like an engineer," which is more about drawing sketches and diagrams than doing pages of vector algebra.

But I don't expect he want you do use really "old-school" graphical methods, and solve some of the those problems by making accurate scale drawings (by hand, not with a CAD package)! But when it was done that way in real life, the more intuition and insight you could get just be looking at the situation, the less you needed to draw.

Well that makes sense; In a tedious, torturous, fun sort of way.
 
AlephZero said:
I would take the comment to mean he wants you to "think like an engineer," which is more about drawing sketches and diagrams than doing pages of vector algebra.

But I don't expect he want you do use really "old-school" graphical methods, and solve some of the those problems by making accurate scale drawings (by hand, not with a CAD package)! But when it was done that way in real life, the more intuition and insight you could get just be looking at the situation, the less you needed to draw.

The first method, yes, but then he said he'd still be somewhat if we did the second method as well.

And Woopy, thanks for the suggestion. Any other options? (i.e, based on the exams)
 
Back
Top