Sum of currents in protection relay

AI Thread Summary
In a differential protection relay like the Areva P521, the threshold setting for the sum of currents is crucial for effective fault protection and selectivity. A threshold range of 10-30% of nominal current is generally recommended to avoid unnecessary tripping, while settings too low can lead to false activations. The relay's ability to display the ratio of positive to negative sequence currents provides insight into the level of unbalance in the system, which may indicate potential issues without necessarily signaling a fault. Proper adjustment of these settings is essential for optimal relay performance. Understanding these parameters enhances the reliability of protection systems in electrical networks.
Vist17
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In a differential protection relay there is a setting of a threshold for the sum of amps (or the squares). In what way would that be of interest? The relay is an Areva P521.
Also, the relay can display the ratio between the positive sequence current and the negative. What information does that give me?
 
Vist17 said:
In a differential protection relay there is a setting of a threshold for the sum of amps (or the squares). In what way would that be of interest? The relay is an Areva P521.
Don't know of characteristics of this one but threshold settings are of particular importance for relays in longitudal differential protection where relays are connected to secondaries of CTs (http://gifyu.com/images/Untitled6566b.png) . Threshold setting corresponding to range 10-30% of a nominal current usually offer sufficient protection level and selectivity for all sorts of faults. But setting the threshold too low, say 0.05In or less, would require almost perfect adjustment of CTs and may cause undesired relay activation and tripping when faults occur elsewhere in the network.
Also, the relay can display the ratio between the positive sequence current and the negative. What information does that give me?

Level of unbalance in the system (which doesn't necessarily mean fault)
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top