Sum of n Terms of 7/(1.2.3) - 17/(2.3.4) + Series

  • Thread starter Thread starter IEVaibhov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Summation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the sum of the series defined by the terms 7/(1.2.3) - 17/(2.3.4) + 31/(3.4.5) - 49/(4.5.6) + 71/(5.6.7) and identifying its general term. Participants suggest analyzing the alternating signs and the patterns in the numerators, which form a sequence with constant differences. The approach involves recognizing the series as a combination of an arithmetic sequence and a factorial denominator, leading to the formulation of the sum. A proposed formula for the sum of n terms is Sn = n(16 + 4n)/2, simplifying to Sn = 8n + 2n^2. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly incorporating both the numerator and denominator to achieve the desired series representation.
IEVaibhov
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Find the sum of n terms of the series:

7/(1.2.3) - 17/(2.3.4) + 31/(3.4.5) - 49/(4.5.6) + 71/(5.6.7) - ...I know how problems like the following are solved :
1. 1/(1.2.3) + 2/(2.3.4) + 3/(3.4.5) + ...
2. 3/(1.2.4) + 4/(2.3.5) + 5/(3.4.6) + ...What will be the general term of the required series? How do I proceed exactly? I am not understanding how to start solving the problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Series can definitely be tricky.

Things to look at first - with a series such you need to look at distinct patterns in the numbers given to you. The first thing that jumps out at my eye is that the sigh (+ or -) alternates each term. What way do series that do that are generally represented?

Next I would tackle this part:

\frac{1}{1*2*3} + \frac{1}{2*3*4} + \frac{1}{3*4*5} and see if you can't come up with a separate summation representation for that. At this point, you almost have all of it done.

The next part is to look at the integer portion at the top, so the [7, 17, 31, 49] part of the terms. See any relationships between them?

Hopefully that helps you get started.
 
If you consider the difference between the difference of the consecutive terms, it comes out to be constant.
7 17 31 49
10 14 18
4 4

Now what?
 
Perfect. Now how would you incorporate that with getting those particular initial terms in a sum? How could you then make the sign change each time?
 
We need a (-1)^n term in the general term for the sign change, that is okay..
Now, I know 2 things :
1: 17 = 7+10
2: 31 = 17 + 14
3: 14 = 10 + 4
Let me put the above two equations in variable form.

Consider this -

7 = x1
17 = x2
31 = x3


10 = y1
14 = y2

and

4 = z1

Basically,

1 => x2 = x1 + y1

2=> x3 = x2 + y2

3=> y2 = y1 + z1

Therefore, we have -

x3 = x1 + 2y1 + z1
 
IEVaibhov said:
If you consider the difference between the difference of the consecutive terms, it comes out to be constant.
7 17 31 49
10 14 18
4 4

Now what?

Don't look at the difference between the difference of the terms. If you just consider the difference of the terms, they form an arithmetic sequence: 10, 14, 18, 22, ...
Now take a look at this:

a2 = a1 + 10
a3 = a2 + 14 = a1 + 10 + 14
a4 = a3 + 18 = a1 + 10 + 14 + 18

It just becomes a1 plus an arithmetic series.

Since a1 = 7, try plugging everything into the formula Sn = n(a1 + an)/2. You'll have to play around a bit with the formula you get, but then that'll take care of the numbers in the numerator.
 
To me, this looks like -
Sn = a1 + 5*2 + 7*2 + ... (till n terms)
and an = a1 + 2*(2n+1) ; n is a natural number that lies between 2 and n.

So, Sn = [n(2a1 + 4n + 2)] / 2

(Since Sn = n(a1 + an) / 2 )

Therefore, Sn = n[16 + 4n] /2
= 8n + 2n^2 ( n going from 2 to n)

Is that correct?
 
Last edited:
If you plug in values for n, does your formula reproduce the sequence you're seeking?
 
Yes..
 
  • #10
Then it's correct.
 
  • #11
Oh wait, I got the summation only for the numerator part.
 
  • #12
Well, see if you can take a stab at it.

The nature of the numbers should make you think factorials. Using that intuitive leap, try to logic out a way to - as vela suggested - plug in n and receive the correct values.
 
  • #13
IEVaibhov said:
Oh wait, I got the summation only for the numerator part.

Don't forget the a1 in the summation formula to get the numbers for the numerators. If bn is the sequence of numbers for the numerators, bn is basically going to be Sn once you've plugged in a1. Then you just have the denominators to finish, and that's easy. :smile:
 
Back
Top