Sum of small displacement vectors.

  • Thread starter STAii
  • Start date
333
1
Suppose we have an object.
The object is moving in a 3D world.
Now, let St1 - t2 denote the displacement vector from moment t1 to moment t2.
Now, let's say that t0 is the moment of the begining of the motion, and (tf) is the last moment of movement.
We can split the time from t0 to tf into small bands, each x seconds long.
Now, let's add up the length of the vectors |St0 - t0+x| + |St0+x - t0+2x| + |St0+2x - t0+3x| + .... + |S(something) - tf| = Y
Now, it is obivous (at least for me) that if you make x smaller and smaller (x->0) then the value of Y will get nearer and nearer to the Distance passed by the object.
First of all, am i right ? Secondly (if so), how can it be prooved ?
Thanks !
 

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,845
17
That is (typically) how the arclength is defiend! What you described is just the riemann sum for the line integral

∫|ds|

The only other way of which I know that one could define the arclength of a path is if you can find a differential mapping from [0, t] to your curve such that the derivitive is always a unit vector. (intuitively this map would thus preserve length), then the arclength of your curve would be t.
 
167
1
Of course this approach would not work in certain cases. e.g. tracing the mandlebrot curve, or a similar fractal.
 

Related Threads for: Sum of small displacement vectors.

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top