Sum of small displacement vectors.

  • Thread starter STAii
  • Start date
  • #1
STAii
333
1
Suppose we have an object.
The object is moving in a 3D world.
Now, let St1 - t2 denote the displacement vector from moment t1 to moment t2.
Now, let's say that t0 is the moment of the begining of the motion, and (tf) is the last moment of movement.
We can split the time from t0 to tf into small bands, each x seconds long.
Now, let's add up the length of the vectors |St0 - t0+x| + |St0+x - t0+2x| + |St0+2x - t0+3x| + .... + |S(something) - tf| = Y
Now, it is obivous (at least for me) that if you make x smaller and smaller (x->0) then the value of Y will get nearer and nearer to the Distance passed by the object.
First of all, am i right ? Secondly (if so), how can it be prooved ?
Thanks !
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,967
19
That is (typically) how the arclength is defiend! What you described is just the riemann sum for the line integral

∫|ds|

The only other way of which I know that one could define the arclength of a path is if you can find a differential mapping from [0, t] to your curve such that the derivitive is always a unit vector. (intuitively this map would thus preserve length), then the arclength of your curve would be t.
 
  • #3
plus
178
1
Of course this approach would not work in certain cases. e.g. tracing the mandlebrot curve, or a similar fractal.
 

Suggested for: Sum of small displacement vectors.

  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
166
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
628
  • Last Post
2
Replies
45
Views
852
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
541
Replies
26
Views
415
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
444
MHB Vectors
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
595
Replies
2
Views
269
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
671
Top