Decomposing B_{ij} into Symmetric and Antisymmetric Tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohanL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Symmetric Tensors
AI Thread Summary
B_{ij} can be decomposed into a symmetric tensor B^S_{ij} and an antisymmetric tensor B^A_{ij} using the formulas B^S_{ij} = (1/2)(B_{ij} + B_{ji}) and B^A_{ij} = (1/2)(B_{ij} - B_{ji}). The symmetric part B^S_{ij} is confirmed to be symmetric, while the antisymmetric part B^A_{ij} is antisymmetric. By substituting these expressions back into the original tensor, it is demonstrated that B_{ij} equals the sum of its symmetric and antisymmetric components. This decomposition is beneficial for simplifying complex tensor analysis in various applications.
JohanL
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
show that B_{ij} can be written as the sum of a symmetric tensor
B^S_{ij} and an antisymmetric tensor B^A_{ij}

i don't know how to do this one.
for a symmetric tensor we have
B^S_{ij} = B^S_{ji}

and for an antisymmetric tensor we have
B^A_{ij} = -B^A_{ji}

the only thing my book says is that the sum should be a tensor of the same type.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:
define the "symmetric part of B" to be
(B_{ij})^S = \frac{1}{2}\left(B_{ij}+ B_{ji}\right)
... quite analogous to defining the "real part of a complex number z" as (z+z*)/2. [Check for yourself that this "symmetric part" is truly symmetric.]

I'm sure you can finish the rest.
 


To decompose a tensor B_{ij} into its symmetric and antisymmetric parts, we can use the following formula:

B_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}(B_{ij} + B_{ji}) + \frac{1}{2}(B_{ij} - B_{ji})

Let's call the first term on the right-hand side B^S_{ij} and the second term B^A_{ij}. It is clear that B^S_{ij} is symmetric, since it is the sum of two symmetric tensors. Similarly, B^A_{ij} is antisymmetric, since it is the difference of two antisymmetric tensors.

To show that B_{ij} can be written as the sum of B^S_{ij} and B^A_{ij}, we can simply substitute the expressions for B^S_{ij} and B^A_{ij} into the original formula:

B_{ij} = \frac{1}{2}(B_{ij} + B_{ji}) + \frac{1}{2}(B_{ij} - B_{ji})

= \frac{1}{2}B_{ij} + \frac{1}{2}B_{ji} + \frac{1}{2}B_{ij} - \frac{1}{2}B_{ji}

= B_{ij}

Thus, we have shown that B_{ij} can be decomposed into its symmetric and antisymmetric parts, B^S_{ij} and B^A_{ij}. This decomposition is useful in many applications, as it allows us to break down a complex tensor into simpler, more manageable components.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top