Sum to infinity of Heaviside function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the Fourier series of a square wave, specifically how to interpret the relationship between the infinite series and the Heaviside function in the context of periodic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the integration range and the definition of the function f, questioning how the infinite series relates to the Heaviside function. Some participants suggest plotting the function to gain insight, while others express confusion about the equivalence of the series to a specific behavior of the Heaviside function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing guidance on the integration range and periodicity of the function. There is a recognition of different interpretations regarding the behavior of the series over specific intervals, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves a Fourier series for a periodic function with a defined period, and there is an emphasis on the behavior of the function within a specific integration range. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of the infinite series beyond the defined interval.

joriarty
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I'm revising my course text for my exam and came across a Fourier series problem finding the Fourier series of the square wave:

[PLAIN]http://img574.imageshack.us/img574/5862/eq1.png.

It is then calculated that the complex Fourier coefficients are

[PLAIN]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/5863/eq2.png

with no intermediary calculations provided.

What I don't understand is how they got:

[PLAIN]http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/1776/eq3y.png

Could someone please explain? Thanks :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the integration range and then at the definition of f again. Then you should see it. Drawing f could also help.
 
I'm still not getting it. Plotting f(t) I get a series of step functions as expected where f(t) = 1 from t = 0 to pi (ie where n = 0), zero from pi to 2*pi (ie where n = 1), one from 2*pi to 3*pi (n = 2) and so on.

But I don't see how this infinite series can be equated to 1 - H(t - pi) which is just equal to 1 from t = 0 to pi and zero elsewhere. That's equivalent to f(t) summed from n = 0 to 0.
 
U do Fourier transform for periodic functions. F is periodic with period 2Pi. So in the integration range f is just 1-H...
 
joriarty said:
I'm still not getting it. Plotting f(t) I get a series of step functions as expected where f(t) = 1 from t = 0 to pi (ie where n = 0), zero from pi to 2*pi (ie where n = 1), one from 2*pi to 3*pi (n = 2) and so on.

If you are integrating from 0 to 2pi, you don't care what happens from 2*pi to 3*pi and so on.

But I don't see how this infinite series can be equated to 1 - H(t - pi) which is just equal to 1 from t = 0 to pi and zero elsewhere. That's equivalent to f(t) summed from n = 0 to 0.

They don't appear to be claiming anything about the entire series, just about it's behavior on [0,2\pi].
 
Ah, I get it now. Thanks guys
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
17K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
28K