What Is the Explanation for the 2n(n+1) in the FP1 Mark Scheme?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobbricks
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of the expression 2n(n+1) in the FP1 mark scheme, particularly in relation to summation notation. Participants clarify that the sum of a constant term, such as (2n+1), over a range can be simplified to (n+1)(2n+1) since the term does not depend on the summation variable r. There is confusion about splitting the summation and how to manipulate the terms correctly, with advice given to avoid unnecessary splits unless justified. The conversation concludes with a request for additional practice questions to prepare for upcoming exams. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding summation properties and careful manipulation of algebraic expressions.
bobbricks
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain the second step in the mark scheme for 10ii? I don't understand where the 2n(n+1) and (n+1) comes from and what the meaning of having r and n terms is when they're both on the left hand side (I'm only used to seeing only r terms on the left hand side with the sigma sign)?

Paper: http://www.edexcel.com/migrationdoc...2000/June 2013 - QP/6667_01R_que_20130610.pdf
Mark scheme: http://www.edexcel.com/migrationdoc...2000/June 2013 - MS/6667_01R_msc_20130815.pdf

I wrote out the following:
[nΣr=0 (r²-2r+2n+1)] =[nΣr=1(r²-2r+2n+1)] +[0Σr=1(r²-2r+2n+1)]
which leads to (1/6) (n+1)(2n²-5n+12), which cannot be factorised further.
Then I thought, it could be [nΣr=0] (r²-2r+2n+1)] =[nΣr=1(r²-2r] +[0Σr=1(r²-2r]+2(n+1)+n which didn't work either, at which point I looked at the mark scheme.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it you accepted (otherwise check here)
$$\sum_{r=0}^n r^3 = {1\over 6} n(n+1)(2n+1) \ \ ;\ \ -2\sum_{r=0}^n r = -2{1\over 2} n(n+1)\ \ ;\ \ \sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (n+1)(2n+1)$$The latter is rewritten as ##2n(n+1) + (n+1)##; then ##-n(n+1) + 2n(n+1) + (n+1) = (n+1)(n+1)##.

Factor out the ##{1\over 6}(n+1)## to get the ##{1\over 6}(n+1) \left \{ 2n^2+n \ + 6(n + 1) \right \}##

[edit] Can't check what went wrong with your "which leads to" unless you spell out how you obtained that.
 
BvU said:
I take it you accepted (otherwise check here)
$$\sum_{r=0}^n r^3 = {1\over 6} n(n+1)(2n+1) \ \ ;\ \ -2\sum_{r=0}^n r = -2{1\over 2} n(n+1)\ \ ;\ \ \sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (n+1)(2n+1)$$The latter is rewritten as ##2n(n+1) + (n+1)##; then ##-n(n+1) + 2n(n+1) + (n+1) = (n+1)(n+1)##.

Factor out the ##{1\over 6}(n+1)## to get the ##{1\over 6}(n+1) \left \{ 2n^2+n \ + 6(n + 1) \right \}##

[edit] Can't check what went wrong with your "which leads to" unless you spell out how you obtained that.

That's the bit I don't understand- Why does the sum from r=0 to n of (2n+1)=(n+1)(2n+1)? -- I would've thought that [nΣr=0 (2n+1)] =[nΣr=0 (1)] +[nΣr=0(2n)] but then I'm not sure on what to do from there
 
You can take the (2n+1) out of the summation: ##\sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (2n+1)\,\sum_{r=0}^n1## (the expression to be summed does not depend on ##r##!).
 
BvU said:
You can take the (2n+1) out of the summation: ##\sum_{r=0}^n (2n+1) = (2n+1)\,\sum_{r=0}^n1## (the expression to be summed does not depend on ##r##!).

So in order to find [nΣr=0 (2n+1)], would you have to do [nΣr=1(2n+1)]+[0Σr=1 (2n+1)] and I would've thought that would become [nΣr=0 (2n+1)]=[n(2n+1)]+[0(2n+1)]..?Also, how do you know (2n+1) is a constant?
 
You want to sum over r=0 to r = n. The only thing that changes from term to term is r.
Varying r doesn't change 2n+1

Terms are 2n+1, each and every one of them, for r=0 to r=n. So n+1 terms "2n+1". The sum is (n+1)(2n+1).
It is so evident, simple and so close in front of you that it might escape you for that reason only.

[edit] Tip: don't split sum r=0 to n in two unless you have a good reason.
 
BvU said:
You want to sum over r=0 to r = n. The only thing that changes from term to term is r.
Varying r doesn't change 2n+1

Terms are 2n+1, each and every one of them, for r=0 to r=n. So n+1 terms "2n+1". The sum is (n+1)(2n+1).
It is so evident, simple and so close in front of you that it might escape you for that reason only.

[edit] Tip: don't split sum r=0 to n in two unless you have a good reason.

Ah, I understand thanks :) ..I don't suppose you know where I could find more questions like this one just to see if I do truly know how to do it now since I don't have anything like this in my textbook, and have exams coming up.
 
Sorry, no. Not at home in that world.
And: good luck with the exams!
 
BvU said:
Sorry, no. Not at home in that world.
And: good luck with the exams!

Okay, thanks for the help though :)
 
Back
Top