Super fun projectile motion ski slope problem

AI Thread Summary
A ski-jumper launches horizontally at 20 m/s from a height of 3 meters above a downward slope angled at 45 degrees. The equations of motion used include y = Vsinθ - (0.5)gt² and x = Vcosθt, with the y-position adjusted for the initial height. The attempt to solve the problem involved substituting time from the x equation into the y equation, leading to a quadratic formula application for the y value. The individual expressed concern about a slight discrepancy between their calculated distance and a measured distance on paper, questioning whether the initial height was correctly factored into their solution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately incorporating initial conditions in projectile motion problems.
Peppo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ski-jumper comes off the bottom of the slope going horizontally at a speed of 20 ms. It starts off 3 m above a slope going downwards at an angle of 45 degrees. How far along the slope does it land.

Homework Equations



1) y= Vsinθ - (.5)gt^2
2) x= Vcosθt
3) tanβ = ||y|| / ||x||

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to find the solution by considering the beginning of the slope to be at the origin with the skiier starting 3 metres above it so my equation for y position was:

4) y = Vsinθt - (.5)gt^2 + 3

-which simplifies to: y = -.5gt^2 + 3 since sinθ is zero.

The x position is given by equation 2.
Using equation 3 to change equation 2 to give the y-position corresponding to the x-position led me to:

-y/V = t (since Vcosθ = V in this case)

I then used this in equation 4 to replace t, and used the quadratic formula to get an answer for the y value.

After this step the distance is just a matter of finding the hypotenuse of a triangle and isn't of interest to me, but what I'm concerned about is that the answer I got is off slightly from what I found when I measured out the problem on computation paper and it's outside (just by a little too much) the error margins given the tools I used for drawing it.

My question is whether or not I correctly incorporated the starting position of 3 metres above the 45 degree angle slope? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks right. If you'd shown your working and answers I would have seen whether your answers accord with mine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top