Superconductor Ginzburg-Landau model

vidi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is it that for a superconductor \alpha<0,\beta>0 in the Ginzburg-Landau model wit free energy formulation
E=\int d^3x\,\, \frac{\vec B^2}{2\mu}+\frac{1}{2m}|(-i\hbar\nabla-e\vec A)\psi|^2+\alpha|\psi|^2+\beta|\psi|^4

Homework Equations



E=\int d^3x\,\, \frac{\vec B^2}{2\mu}+\frac{1}{2m}|(-i\hbar\nabla-e\vec A)\psi|^2+\alpha|\psi|^2+\beta|\psi|^4

The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea how to start! perhaps it has to do with some critical temperature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\beta >0, otherwise the free energy could be minimized by |\psi |\rightarrow \infty. This may not be obviously unphysical, but the Ginzburg-Landau model does after all aim to model the phase transition around |\psi |=0.

\alpha <0, then. The parameter \alpha is indeed related to the critical temperature, but you don't need to look at the temperature dependence here. Just consider the simpler case with \vec{A}=0 and \nabla \psi \approx 0 and minimize the free energy. This will give you the sign. Of course, you'll probably have to extend the arguments a bit, to account for the inhomogeneous case and non-zero vector potentials, but that's the basic idea anyway.
 
Thanks, Hypersphere.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top