Superconductors can allow a current to flow indefinately

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential use of room temperature superconductors as a form of RAM for computers, allowing for indefinite current flow and rapid access to stored information. The concept involves using superconducting loops to represent binary data, where the direction of current indicates 0 or 1. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of measuring current direction without disrupting the flow, especially in tiny loops designed for compact data storage. The conversation also touches on SQUIDs, which can hold currents in both directions simultaneously, suggesting a quantum superposition state that could enhance data storage capabilities. However, skepticism exists regarding the practicality of using microwaves for state manipulation in high-density storage, with some participants suggesting that qubits may be better developed in other mediums rather than superconducting loops.
Jade Falcon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Superconductors can allow a current to flow indefinately. Assuming that someday room temperature superconductors are avilable, would it be possible to use them as some sort of RAM hybrid for a computer? Could information be stored indefinately, almost like using a harddrive, but much faster access time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you picturing a bunch of little superconducting loops, each of which stores a bit of information? So that when you turn off the computer, the currents continue indefinitely, one clock direction representing 0, the opposite clock direction representing 1?

I wonder if the process of measuring the direction of current would destroy the current if the loop is really tiny--tiny enough to make for compact storage of data on a par with today's technology for data storage.
 
Janitor said:
Are you picturing a bunch of little superconducting loops, each of which stores a bit of information? So that when you turn off the computer, the currents continue indefinitely, one clock direction representing 0, the opposite clock direction representing 1?

I wonder if the process of measuring the direction of current would destroy the current if the loop is really tiny--tiny enough to make for compact storage of data on a par with today's technology for data storage.

Actually, in SQUIDS experiment, those tiny loops can contain current flowing in BOTH directions simultaneously. That's the essence of the QM superposition. So your "qubits" can be 0, 1, and a mixture of both - similar to a schrodinger cat-type states. One can detect this via the energy difference between the two superposition states.

http://physicsweb.org/article/news/4/7/2/1

Zz.
 
ZapperZ, I read the page you linked. It says, "Next they illuminate the SQUID with microwaves which excite the system to a clockwise state with higher energy," in order to change the state.

I picture microwaves as being mighty broad brushes to paint bits with--on the order of centimeters in size. So in practice, can this technique ever be practical for a high-density information storage device?
 
Janitor said:
ZapperZ, I read the page you linked. It says, "Next they illuminate the SQUID with microwaves which excite the system to a clockwise state with higher energy," in order to change the state.

I picture microwaves as being mighty broad brushes to paint bits with--on the order of centimeters in size. So in practice, can this technique ever be practical for a high-density information storage device?

Probabily not. I think the qubits in quantum computing will probably be created in another type of medium, rather than loops of circulating supercurrents such as this.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top