Understanding Superluminal Jets and Accretion Emissions from Black Holes

  • Thread starter Thread starter protonchain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jets Superluminal
AI Thread Summary
Superluminal jets from black holes are primarily an optical illusion caused by the angle of view, rather than actual particles traveling faster than light. The phenomenon can be likened to the 'lighthouse paradox,' where a rapidly rotating beam of light appears to move faster than the speed of light across a surface, even though no physical object is moving that quickly. Detecting these jets may involve observing Cherenkov radiation, but the superluminal appearance is not indicative of true superluminal motion. The discussion reassures that the universe operates within the laws of physics, maintaining that nothing exceeds the speed of light. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the nature of black hole emissions and their observational effects.
protonchain
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
So I've skimmed certain papers several years ago indicating that radio jets and other accretion-related emissions from black holes can be superluminal.

Is this true, or is this just the relative motion of particles in some medium other than vacuum that exceeds the speed of light?

I'm assuming that detecting these involves detecting cherenkov radiation?

Sorry if this seems somewhat newbish, I'm hoping someone with more expertise in the field can shed some light on this. Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No superluminal jets are an angle of view effect, nothing is traveling faster than light
This animation sort of explains it http://www.physics.purdue.edu/MOJAVE/superluminal.swf

Another way is the 'lighthouse paradox' imagine a powerfull jet of radiation on Earth - say a laser beam, being spun around at a high rpm. You see the laser beam light up a dot that moves rapily across the surface of the moon - you measure the time taken to cross the moon and it works out at faster than c. But nothing is really moving 'across the moon' it's just the point where the beam hits something that lights up.
 
Ah! Now THAT makes sense! Thanks for the clarification, I'm glad to know the universe will be alright and we're not all going insane.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Back
Top