Superposition of 2 Similar Frequencies from Separate Sources

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xbehave
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When two sounds of similar frequencies are emitted from separate sources, they create an interference pattern characterized by constructive and destructive interference, resulting in beats. The sound pressure levels from each source can be described as functions of time and space, leading to an interesting spatial interference pattern. Despite the separation, listeners will still perceive the beat frequency at any single point over time. This phenomenon can be observed in real-life scenarios, such as musicians tuning instruments, where the elimination of beats indicates successful tuning. Understanding this concept involves considering the problem in terms of vector fields and superposition principles.
Xbehave
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If 2 sounds of similar freq are emited from the same source you get beats, but what happens if two sounds of similar freq are emited from separate sources. I realize that its just superposition but i can't figure out what it would be like in the space between the two sources.
Im happy to initially assume that the 2 amplitude are the same and only consider the 2d plane between the two sources.
Is this easy to solve?
Is this problem best considerd in vector fields? if so then how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two frequencies do not have to be from the same source to get beats.
 
Beats happen because of constructive and destructive interference. You can describe the sound pressure level from each source as a function of time and space. If the sources are not in the same place then you will have an interesting interference pattern in space, but even so if you listen for a while at any single point you will hear the beat frequency.
 
Again there will be beats. An everyday illustration: Go somewhere where you can watch musicians manually tuning instruments, with respect to another instrument. The standard or reference instrument is one source, and the one being tuned is another, separated by some space. Tuning is done, the beats are gone - and as soon as beats are gone, they know, it's tuned

--------------
http://moonforhumanity.zxq.net
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top