Surface brightness profiles: sech^2 fit in mag/arcsec^2 units?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around fitting a sech^2 profile to surface brightness values in mag/arcsec^2 for an edge-on galactic disk. The original poster faced challenges due to the inverted nature of magnitude units, which caused the profile to appear upside-down. They sought a method to convert the density profile into magnitude units while maintaining accuracy. Ultimately, they found success by converting mag/arcsec^2 values into luminosity density (L_sun/pc^2), fitting the data, and then translating the fitted curve back into magnitude units. The solution, while awkward, effectively preserved the necessary information for analysis.
mdemone
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody, I have a very quick question about surface brightness profiles for an edge-on galactic disk.

I have surface brightness values (V-band, not that it matters) in units of mag/arcsec^2 as usual, as a function of z, which is the distance from the galactic disk's plane. I'd like to fit a typical sech^2 profile, usually quoted as:

I(z) = I(0)*(sech(z/z0))^2

where I(0) is the peak luminosity density and z0 is some scale height. Now this would be fine for me, except I'm working in magnitude units, i.e. the peak is something like 21 mag/arcsec^2 and it drops off quickly (for a thin disk) to ~30 mag/arcsec^2. Thus when I plot the above profile on a y-axis inverted for magnitude units, I get an upside-down profile that disappears off in the positive y-direction.

So my question, as dumb as it may be, is how do I convert the above density profile into magnitude units, i.e. I need mu(z) = mu(0) * some sech^2 function.

I know I've seen this form floating around somewhere before, but I can't find it and my first few attempts have been miserable. I really would appreciate just a quick answer for this simple problem.

Thanks in advance! Please mention a source if at all possible, either textbook or article or whatever, just for my own future benefit.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I solved it -- of course the easiest thing to do turned out to be converting the mag/arcsec^2 values into real luminosity density = L_sun/pc^2, then fitting the result and translating the fitted curve back into mag/arcsec^2 units.

Sort of awkward, but it seems to have worked without losing any information. I still could swear I've seen a magnitude version of the vertical disk sech^2 profile somewhere; ah well...
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top